fh--- via Postfix-users:
>
> >
> > If I remember correctly, someone mentioned NoListing recently on that
> > list.
> > For this, you *need* a secondary MX, and it is actually your main mail
> > server - the primary MX never accepts mail...
>
> Hallo,
>
> 1. what's the advantage of this archite
If I remember correctly, someone mentioned NoListing recently on that
list.
For this, you *need* a secondary MX, and it is actually your main mail
server - the primary MX never accepts mail...
Hallo,
1. what's the advantage of this architecture?
2. how to make primary MX not accepting mes
On 2/04/23 09:03, Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users wrote:
Dnia 1.04.2023 o godz. 13:04:30 Peter via Postfix-users pisze:
Secondary, or backup MXes are almost never recommended in the modern
internet and tend to be a relic of the 1990s dialup internet.
[...]
None of this is what you are consid
Dnia 1.04.2023 o godz. 13:04:30 Peter via Postfix-users pisze:
>
> Secondary, or backup MXes are almost never recommended in the modern
> internet and tend to be a relic of the 1990s dialup internet.
[...]
> None of this is what you are considering. If you still want to
> implement a secondary M
Corey Hickman via Postfix-users writes:
> Hello,
>
> Since almost every sending MTA has the queues, do I need a secondary
> MX for my domain email?
>
> I am afraid the secondary MX was abused by spammers.
>
> Thanks.
I am now running secondary mx. It is valuable for me.
Use MTA-STS (testing is
On 01/04/2023 08:04, Peter via Postfix-users wrote:
On 1/04/23 00:36, Corey Hickman via Postfix-users wrote:
Since almost every sending MTA has the queues, do I need a secondary
MX for my domain email?
Secondary, or backup MXes are almost never recommended in the modern
internet and tend to be
On 1/04/23 00:36, Corey Hickman via Postfix-users wrote:
Since almost every sending MTA has the queues, do I need a secondary MX
for my domain email?
Secondary, or backup MXes are almost never recommended in the modern
internet and tend to be a relic of the 1990s dialup internet. What is
oft
