[pfx] Re: omitting the X-Google-Original-From header

2023-12-22 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users
Hallo. Lars Kollstedt via Postfix-users wrote in <5d6f30a5-9401-47e7-90a9-627bd6447...@man-da.de>: |on 18.12.23 um 23:15 Steffen Nurpmeso wrote via Postfix-users: |>|> X-Google-Original-From:nicho...@mordor.saundersconsulting.tech |>| |>|By Google. Exactly what their algorithm is for it is no

[pfx] Re: omitting the X-Google-Original-From header

2023-12-22 Thread Lars Kollstedt via Postfix-users
Hi, on 18.12.23 um 23:15 Steffen Nurpmeso wrote via Postfix-users: |> X-Google-Original-From:nicho...@mordor.saundersconsulting.tech | |By Google. Exactly what their algorithm is for it is not known. The "X-" |prefix is the clue: it's an experimental or local-use header. Note that the

[pfx] Re: omitting the X-Google-Original-From header

2023-12-19 Thread Bill Cole via Postfix-users
On 2023-12-18 at 17:15:16 UTC-0500 (Mon, 18 Dec 2023 23:15:16 +0100) Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users is rumored to have said: Bill Cole via Postfix-users wrote in <6039ed61-2c8f-4a12-b736-994d32632...@billmail.scconsult.com>: |On 2023-12-17 at 09:27:36 UTC-0500 (Sun, 17 Dec 2023 06:27:36 -

[pfx] Re: omitting the X-Google-Original-From header

2023-12-18 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users
Bill Cole via Postfix-users wrote in <6039ed61-2c8f-4a12-b736-994d32632...@billmail.scconsult.com>: |On 2023-12-17 at 09:27:36 UTC-0500 (Sun, 17 Dec 2023 06:27:36 -0800 |(PST)) |saunders.nicholas--- via Postfix-users |is rumored to have said: | |> How is this header populated? |> |> X-Go

[pfx] Re: omitting the X-Google-Original-From header

2023-12-17 Thread Bill Cole via Postfix-users
On 2023-12-17 at 09:27:36 UTC-0500 (Sun, 17 Dec 2023 06:27:36 -0800 (PST)) saunders.nicholas--- via Postfix-users is rumored to have said: How is this header populated? X-Google-Original-From: nicho...@mordor.saundersconsulting.tech By Google. Exactly what their algorithm is for it is not k