On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 10:41:08AM -0400, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
> Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users:
> > On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 02:20:55PM -0400, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
> > wrote:
> > > Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users:
> > > > That's fine, the SRV records can be keyed
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 02:20:55PM -0400, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
> wrote:
> > Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users:
> > > That's fine, the SRV records can be keyed by destination domain.
> >
> > Locally-managed SRV records, keyed by the final destination
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 02:20:55PM -0400, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
> Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users:
> > That's fine, the SRV records can be keyed by destination domain.
>
> Locally-managed SRV records, keyed by the final destination domain
> name, to select a local relay host?
Y
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users:
> That's fine, the SRV records can be keyed by destination domain.
Locally-managed SRV records, keyed by the final destination domain
name, to select a local relay host?
Wietse
___
Postfix-users mailing list --
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 05:22:52PM +, Colin McKinnon wrote:
> > What kind of "load balancing"? Why won't MX records do? For uneven
> > weights, you can even use SRV records:
>
> I'm trying to setup load balancing across a cluster of relays for a
> SAAS application. There's several problems
Hi Viktor,
Wietse also replied to say I wasn't able to solve this with Postfix.
>
> What kind of "load balancing"? Why won't MX records do? For uneven
> weights, you can even use SRV records:
>
I'm trying to setup load balancing across a cluster of relays for a
SAAS application. There's several
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 01:52:42PM +, Colin McKinnon via Postfix-users
wrote:
> I want to provision load balancing for my relays.
What kind of "load balancing"? Why won't MX records do? For uneven
weights, you can even use SRV records:
use_srv_lookup = smtp
relayhost = mx.example.
Colin McKinnon via Postfix-users:
> Hi,
>
> I want to provision load balancing for my relays. The catch is that
> there is already some customized routing in place based on recipient
> domain and large block lists. These are currently handled by a
> transport map.
>
> I would prefer not to implem
Hi,
Stuck again.
Using
smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions = check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:8822
smtpd_policy_service_default_action = DUNNO
I get:
Mar 26 15:49:03 test106 postfix/smtpd[163532]: warning: access
table inet:127.0.0.1:8822 has entry with lookup table:
smtp:[test105.southwo
Hi all,
I found that check_policy_service works (maybe*) in
`smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions =`. So I'm guessing it might work in
any *_restrictions configuration.
(*still having some issues getting this to work as expected, but I'll
come back here if I get stuck)
Colin
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 at 13
10 matches
Mail list logo
