On 5/22/2025 6:13 PM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
carespot-donotre...@carespot.com${2}
CAUTION: this is not needed. Your canonical mapping already does a
better job: it fixes both the sender address in the header and in the
envelope (the MAIL FROM command).
Thank you. I found the cu
Matthew Kitchin via Postfix-users:
> On 5/22/2025 3:33 PM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
> > To be precise, Postfix delivers the message with the 'good' display
> > name in the From: header. The unexpected change happens after Postfix
> > has delivered the message to some other system.
> >
On 5/22/2025 3:33 PM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
To be precise, Postfix delivers the message with the 'good' display
name in the From: header. The unexpected change happens after Postfix
has delivered the message to some other system.
Maybe Azure SMTP is doing something to the messa
Matthew Kitchin via Postfix-users:
> On 5/22/2025 2:34 PM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
> >>
> > Postfix receives the message with
> >
> > From: John Doe
> >
> >> May 22 16:58:23 vm-prod-netbox postfix/qmgr[265519]: 6A63814A356:
> >> from=, size=597, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
> >> May
On 5/22/2025 2:34 PM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
Postfix receives the message with
From: John Doe
May 22 16:58:23 vm-prod-netbox postfix/qmgr[265519]: 6A63814A356:
from=, size=597, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
May 22 16:58:24 vm-prod-netbox postfix/smtp[438515]: 6A63814A356:
info
Matthew Kitchin via Postfix-users:
> On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 11:55?AM Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> > What is the "Case 2" Postfix From: logging?
> >
> > - The logging from the cleanup proccess shows the From: display
> >name as received by Postfix, before canonical mapping.
>
* Marvin Renich via Postfix-users [250522 14:47]:
> If I am not mistaken, the static: returns f...@example.com for _all_
> queries, as opposed to returning "" for queries matching
> f...@example.com. This would explain the behavior you are seeing.
>
> Try using
>
> sender_canonical_maps = hash:
* Matthew Kitchin via Postfix-users [250522 13:04]:
> On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 11:58 AM Marvin Renich via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> >
> > What is «postconf sender_canonical_maps»? Is it
> >
> > sender_canonical_maps = f...@example.com
> >
> > If so, you need to read «man 5 canonical». sender_c
On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 11:58 AM Marvin Renich via Postfix-users
wrote:
>
> What is «postconf sender_canonical_maps»? Is it
>
> sender_canonical_maps = f...@example.com
>
> If so, you need to read «man 5 canonical». sender_canonical_maps should
> be a mapping table with each row containing a pa
On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 11:55 AM Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
wrote:
> What is the "Case 2" Postfix From: logging?
>
> - The logging from the cleanup proccess shows the From: display
>name as received by Postfix, before canonical mapping.
>
> - The logging from the smtp process shows the F
Matthew Kitchin:
> On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 10:46?AM Wietse Venema wrote:
> >
> > How can I help? The purpose of my request is to find out if the
> > unexpected display name change happens before Postfix receives the
> > message, while Postfix processes the message, or after Postfix
> > delivers th
* Matthew Kitchin via Postfix-users [250522 12:12]:
> On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 10:46 AM Wietse Venema wrote:
> >
> > How can I help? The purpose of my request is to find out if the
> > unexpected display name change happens before Postfix receives the
> > message, while Postfix processes the messa
On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 10:46 AM Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> How can I help? The purpose of my request is to find out if the
> unexpected display name change happens before Postfix receives the
> message, while Postfix processes the message, or after Postfix
> delivers the message.
>
I'm sorry. I jus
On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 6:34 PM Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
wrote:
>
> The above is correct, but Setting it aside the for a moment, have you
> considered relaying the outbound mail from Azure via an on-prem
> submission service you control? That way, you're not subject to
> Azure's policie
On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 05:46:34PM -0400, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
> Matthew Kitchin via Postfix-users:
> > Hey all, former longtime user, but been away from Postfix for about 13
> > years.
> > I'm migrating a datacenter to Azure. We have a variety of things
> > (websites, copiers,
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
> Matthew Kitchin via Postfix-users:
> > Hey all, former longtime user, but been away from Postfix for about 13
> > years.
> > I'm migrating a datacenter to Azure. We have a variety of things
> > (websites, copiers, monitoring apps, etc.) that send emails that don'
Matthew Kitchin via Postfix-users:
> Hey all, former longtime user, but been away from Postfix for about 13 years.
> I'm migrating a datacenter to Azure. We have a variety of things
> (websites, copiers, monitoring apps, etc.) that send emails that don't
> need to be replied to. In an Azure environ
17 matches
Mail list logo
