On Fri, 5 Jul 2024 at 09:10, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users <
postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote:
> I think in case of amavis it's just the order of logs being written.
> IIUC amavis does not confirm receiving message from postfix until after
> it's
> scanned and passed further, which is w
On 05.07.24 08:42, Gilgongo via Postfix-users wrote:
I'm setting up a server to handle outbound mail for sasl auth accounts and
would like to scan that mail for spam and malware before DKIM signing
because I assume scanning might potentially add headers that could break
the sig.
Right now I have
On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 08:42:31AM +0100, Gilgongo via Postfix-users wrote:
> # For OpenDKIM signing
> 127.0.0.1:10027inetn-n--smtpd
> ... configs...
> -o smtpd_milters=inet:127.0.0.1:8891
>
> So I assume DKIM should come last. But the logs imply the spam/v
