Viktor, thanks a lot for your time. it is now cristal clear to me... i owe
you a beer! :-)
Kind regards,
Pete.
On Tuesday, September 3, 2024 at 06:02:00 AM GMT+2, Viktor Dukhovni via
Postfix-users wrote:
On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 10:12:57AM +0800, LinuxMail.cc via Postfix-users wrote:
On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 02:01:20PM +1000, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
wrote:
> So in terms of connection policy, these behave the same:
>
>1. some.example. IN MX 0 mx.some.example.
> mx.some.example. IN 192.0.2.1
> mx.some.example. IN 192.0.2.2
> mx.some.examp
On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 10:12:57AM +0800, LinuxMail.cc via Postfix-users wrote:
> IIRC for the group of IPs with the same weight,
> Postfix put them into a array with max size 8, and pick up one from the
> array by round robin.
Why guess?
https://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtp_mx_s
IIRC for the group of IPs with the same weight,
Postfix put them into a array with max size 8, and pick up one from the
array by round robin.
On 2024-09-03 05:35, Pedro David Marco via Postfix-users wrote:
Hi everybody...
i think Wietse has explaned this before, but i cannot find the posts
