On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 06:48:00PM -0400, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
> > > I'd have thought it'd at least try, similar to how it does in when
> > > using my sendmail host. My configuration remained the same, except
> > > for changing the host to the machine running postfix instead.
> >
Bill Cole via Postfix-users:
> On 2025-05-15 at 14:53:47 UTC-0400 (Thu, 15 May 2025 19:53:47 +0100)
> Maya Copeland via Postfix-users
> is rumored to have said:
>
> > I'd have thought it'd at least try, similar to how it does in when
> > using my
> > sendmail host. My configuration remained the
On 2025-05-15 at 14:53:47 UTC-0400 (Thu, 15 May 2025 19:53:47 +0100)
Maya Copeland via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
I'd have thought it'd at least try, similar to how it does in when
using my
sendmail host. My configuration remained the same, except for changing
the
host to the mach
Maya Copeland via Postfix-users:
> IMAP DEBUG 14:17:19 5/15: 220 hostname ESMTP Postfix
> IMAP DEBUG 14:17:19 5/15: EHLO desktop
> IMAP DEBUG 14:17:19 5/15: 250-hostname
> IMAP DEBUG 14:17:19 5/15: 250-PIPELINING
> IMAP DEBUG 14:17:19 5/15: 250-SIZE 25000
> IMAP DEBUG 14:17:19 5/15: 250-VRFY
>
I'd have thought it'd at least try, similar to how it does in when using my
sendmail host. My configuration remained the same, except for changing the
host to the machine running postfix instead.
The only thing I've noticed that was different is that instead of 554
(relaying denied), sendmail gave
