On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 11:54:16PM +0200, lutz.niede...@gmx.net wrote:
> Ah, still one question. I don't remember exactly where, but I believe
> that you said it would be better to split into separate instances.
> Sorry, can't find it anymore.
https://www.postfix.org/MULTI_INSTANCE_README.ht
ivery). Do we have to expact any problems
with that or is it safe?
> Gesendet: Montag, 14. August 2023 um 23:31 Uhr
> Von: "Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users"
> An: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Betreff: [pfx] Re: How to block subaddressing from extern with a table
>
>
Thank you very much.
And "yes!!!", I understand you very well.
But, we want to make things simple.
> Gesendet: Montag, 14. August 2023 um 23:31 Uhr
> Von: "Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users"
> An: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Betreff: [pfx] Re: How to block
On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 11:04:56PM +0200, lutz.niederer--- via Postfix-users
wrote:
> we need to block subaddressing from extern, and only from extern.
> Internally we use it really often.
A sensible initial simplification is to not mix inbound and outbound
mail on the same Postfix instance. Th
On 8/14/2023 4:04 PM, lutz.niederer--- via Postfix-users wrote:
Hi,
we need to block subaddressing from extern, and only from extern. Internally
we use it really often.
We thought about a table that denies recipient addresses that got a "+". But
how do we filter only if they do not come fro