On 2024-10-16 at 10:26:53 UTC-0400 (Wed, 16 Oct 2024 15:26:53 +0100)
Dominic Preston via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
I thought that's an ideal role for Dnsmasq, I primarily want to use
the
existing resolver whilst spoofing some queries, which is something
that
Pi-hole uses Dnsmasq
Dnia 16.10.2024 o godz. 15:01:06 Dominic Preston via Postfix-users pisze:
>
> Thanks, I'm not currently running a DNS resolver on the server, but if the
> unresponsive PTR record issue persists I'll look into Unbound or maybe
> Dnsmasq.
No, no. If you are running a mail server, you *should* run y
On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 at 15:16, Bill Cole via Postfix-users <
postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote:
> If what you're seeing is a postscreen delay on your own mail server, you
> can exempt your client IP's with a postscreen_access_list
>
No, it's a PTR record lookup on receipt of an inbound connection,
On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 at 15:10, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users <
postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote:
>
> dnsmasq is forwarding resolver and as such a bad idea for a mail server.
> ...maybe unless you want to avoid all levels of spam filtering.
>
I'm not even running my own caching nameserve
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 03:01:06PM +0100, Dominic Preston via Postfix-users
wrote:
> Thanks, I'm not currently running a DNS resolver on the server, but if the
> unresponsive PTR record issue persists I'll look into Unbound or maybe
> Dnsmasq.
A Postfix MTA *should* have a local Unbound or simil
On 2024-10-16 at 09:52:43 UTC-0400 (Wed, 16 Oct 2024 14:52:43 +0100)
Dominic Preston via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 at 14:30, Bill Cole via Postfix-users <
postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote:
[]
However, multi-second delays at connect time are perfectly norma
On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 at 14:43, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users <
postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote:
Configure the system resolver to be *authoritative* for the IP
address(es) in question, serving an "empty" zone (perhaps just SOA and
NS). If the address block is smaller than a /24, you'll need t
On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 at 14:43, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users <
postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote:
>
> Configure the system resolver to be *authoritative* for the IP
> address(es) in question, serving an "empty" zone (perhaps just SOA and
> NS). If the address block is smaller than a /24, you'll
On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 at 14:30, Bill Cole via Postfix-users <
postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote:
> On 2024-10-16 at 09:05:09 UTC-0400 (Wed, 16 Oct 2024 14:05:09 +0100)
> Dominic Preston via Postfix-users
> is rumored to have said:
>
> When sending email via my email client, there is a delay of about
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 02:05:09PM +0100, Dominic Preston via Postfix-users
wrote:
> When sending email via my email client, there is a delay of about 5 seconds
> before the email sends. I believe this is as a result of my ISP's DNS
> servers being unresponsive when responding to PTR record looku
On 2024-10-16 at 09:05:09 UTC-0400 (Wed, 16 Oct 2024 14:05:09 +0100)
Dominic Preston via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
When sending email via my email client, there is a delay of about 5
seconds
before the email sends. I believe this is as a result of my ISP's DNS
servers being unresp
11 matches
Mail list logo
