[pfx] Re: Cloudmark CSI

2024-10-30 Thread Adriel via Postfix-users
On 2024-10-31 01:44, APach via Postfix-users wrote: If you have Cloudmark in your system you will see... 11:30:51.091 5 EXTFILTER inp(105): 2757 ADDHEADER "X-Junk-Score: 69 [XX]\eX-SpamCatcher-Score: 69 [XX]\e (100%)\tBODY: likely offers spam" 11:30:51.091 4 EXTFILTER [5414373] ADDHEADER(X-Ju

[pfx] Re: Cloudmark CSI

2024-10-30 Thread APach via Postfix-users
Dear. Here is link. https://csi.cloudmark.com/en/reset/ ___ Best Regards Andriy Pachkovskyy Mob. tel. +48504122924 Mob. tel. +380679421834 Sip tel. 220...@lviv-ua.com Email:ap...@lviv-ua.com Jabber: ap...@lviv-ua.com On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 16:48:04 +0800

[pfx] Re: Cloudmark CSI

2024-10-30 Thread Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users
Adriel via Postfix-users skrev den 2024-10-30 09:48: Some of my messages were rejected by cloudmark CSI though the message content was totally valid. Do you know this BL provider? Is it a reliable one? Thank you. logs ? CSI gives an reject message to follow sorting out, but end users cant, s

[pfx] Re: Cloudmark CSI

2024-10-30 Thread Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users
APach via Postfix-users skrev den 2024-10-30 17:35: https://csi.cloudmark.com/en/reset/ the reject messages is more correct, your help is here bogus, sorry ___ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[pfx] Re: Cloudmark CSI

2024-10-30 Thread APach via Postfix-users
If you have Cloudmark in your system you will see... 11:30:51.091 5 EXTFILTER inp(105): 2757 ADDHEADER "X-Junk-Score: 69 [XX]\eX-SpamCatcher-Score: 69 [XX]\e (100%)\tBODY: likely offers spam" 11:30:51.091 4 EXTFILTER [5414373] ADDHEADER(X-Junk-Score: 69 [XX]\nX-SpamCatcher-Score: 69 [XX]\n (

[pfx] Re: Cloudmark CSI

2024-10-30 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Adriel via Postfix-users: > Some of my messages were rejected by cloudmark CSI though the message > content was totally valid. Do you know this BL provider? Is it a > reliable one? Thank you. Isn't that an **IP based*** reputation service? Wietse