On 2024-10-31 01:44, APach via Postfix-users wrote:
If you have Cloudmark in your system you will see...
11:30:51.091 5 EXTFILTER inp(105): 2757 ADDHEADER "X-Junk-Score: 69
[XX]\eX-SpamCatcher-Score: 69 [XX]\e (100%)\tBODY: likely offers spam"
11:30:51.091 4 EXTFILTER [5414373] ADDHEADER(X-Ju
Dear.
Here is link.
https://csi.cloudmark.com/en/reset/
___
Best Regards Andriy Pachkovskyy
Mob. tel. +48504122924
Mob. tel. +380679421834
Sip tel. 220...@lviv-ua.com
Email:ap...@lviv-ua.com
Jabber: ap...@lviv-ua.com
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 16:48:04 +0800
Adriel via Postfix-users skrev den 2024-10-30 09:48:
Some of my messages were rejected by cloudmark CSI though the message
content was totally valid. Do you know this BL provider? Is it a
reliable one? Thank you.
logs ?
CSI gives an reject message to follow sorting out, but end users cant,
s
APach via Postfix-users skrev den 2024-10-30 17:35:
https://csi.cloudmark.com/en/reset/
the reject messages is more correct, your help is here bogus, sorry
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
If you have Cloudmark in your system you will see...
11:30:51.091 5 EXTFILTER inp(105): 2757 ADDHEADER "X-Junk-Score: 69 [XX]\eX-SpamCatcher-Score: 69 [XX]\e (100%)\tBODY: likely
offers spam"
11:30:51.091 4 EXTFILTER [5414373] ADDHEADER(X-Junk-Score: 69 [XX]\nX-SpamCatcher-Score: 69 [XX]\n (
Adriel via Postfix-users:
> Some of my messages were rejected by cloudmark CSI though the message
> content was totally valid. Do you know this BL provider? Is it a
> reliable one? Thank you.
Isn't that an **IP based*** reputation service?
Wietse