[pfx] Re: [ext] Re: DKIM and DMARC

2023-05-17 Thread Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users
Tom Reed via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-05-17 09:31: On 16.05.23 16:38, Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users wrote: dmarc does not imho use ARC results yet :/ You must configure trusted ARC signers. You can't blindly trust ARC just like you can't blindly trust SPF May I ask what policyd or mi

[pfx] Re: [ext] Re: DKIM and DMARC

2023-05-17 Thread Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-05-17 09:28: On 16.05.23 16:38, Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users wrote: dmarc does not imho use ARC results yet :/ You must configure trusted ARC signers. You can't blindly trust ARC just like you can't blindly trust SPF i recheck my op

[pfx] Re: [ext] Re: DKIM and DMARC

2023-05-17 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
On 16.05.23 16:38, Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users wrote: dmarc does not imho use ARC results yet :/ You must configure trusted ARC signers. You can't blindly trust ARC just like you can't blindly trust SPF On 17.05.23 15:31, Tom Reed via Postfix-users wrote: May I ask what policyd or milt

[pfx] Re: [ext] Re: DKIM and DMARC

2023-05-17 Thread Tom Reed via Postfix-users
> On 16.05.23 16:38, Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users wrote: >>dmarc does not imho use ARC results yet :/ > > You must configure trusted ARC signers. > You can't blindly trust ARC just like you can't blindly trust SPF > May I ask what policyd or milter you use for SPF checks? -- sent from ht

[pfx] Re: [ext] Re: DKIM and DMARC

2023-05-17 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
On 16.05.23 16:38, Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users wrote: dmarc does not imho use ARC results yet :/ You must configure trusted ARC signers. You can't blindly trust ARC just like you can't blindly trust SPF -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wi

[pfx] Re: [ext] Re: DKIM and DMARC

2023-05-16 Thread Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users
Ralf Hildebrandt via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-05-16 15:20: * Scott Kitterman via Postfix-users : DKIM has no policy mechanism associated with it, so there's no basis in any standardized mechanism to determine if a DKIM failure should be cause for rejection. I don't think it makes logical

[pfx] Re: [ext] Re: DKIM and DMARC

2023-05-16 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt via Postfix-users
* Scott Kitterman via Postfix-users : > DKIM has no policy mechanism associated with it, so there's no basis in any > standardized mechanism to determine if a DKIM failure should be cause for > rejection. I don't think it makes logical sense to treat a message with a > DKIM signature that fail