[pfx] milter~regex homepage (was: Re: per-domain header checks?)

2025-04-17 Thread Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users
* Alex via Postfix-users: > It looks like this is the place to start? > https://github.com/milter-regex/milter-regex/tree/main I recommend starting at http://benzedrine.ch/milter-regex.html instead, because that's the official milter-regex homepage (plus, it shows the formatted manpage). -Ralph

[pfx] Milter reject puzzle

2025-03-26 Thread Paul Enlund via Postfix-users
Hello Using postfx 3.6.4 need help /guidance on how best to resolve the problem below. I am 100% sure the email arriving has looped many times and will have way to many Received headers this time. Is this deferral coming from 1 of the 3 milters I use openarc,opendmarc,opendkim or is it Post

[pfx] Milter

2025-03-14 Thread RBTC System Administrator via Postfix-users
I'm not having any functional issues. This is more a question of postfix logging context. For example i have a log entry for a connection attempt as follows: (which is the correct flow) postfix/postscreen[pid]: connect from unknown[xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]:someport to [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]:25 prequeuemilt

[pfx] milter service connection refused

2025-01-22 Thread Curtis Vaughan via Postfix-users
I realize there have been a lot of posts about this issue, but in my attempts so far, nothing has resolved this issue for me. The postfix server in question is running on Ubuntu LTS 24.04 and has been in operation for over a decade. But today while looking in the logs about a different issue I

[pfx] milter message

2024-12-29 Thread Gerd Hoerst via Postfix-users
Hi ! as i wrote in a previous post im moving my mail server to another one with mostly copying the config.. i made some tests before moving it... Now i have some warnings in my log which i cannot associate 2024-12-29T14:09:37.542057+01:00 virgo postfix/cleanup[969428]: warning: Milter servi

[pfx] milter regex rejects

2024-12-13 Thread Laura Steynes via Postfix-users
Hi, I've noticed since implementing milter-regex that if there is an inbound message addressed to two addresses, that if one is caught by a milter-regex reject rule (stopping a html message to a system address which does some automation), but the other recipient being a normal addressee not caught

[pfx] milter-regex.sock problem

2024-12-05 Thread natan via Postfix-users
Hi Today i run setup postfix+milter-regex.sock Some times in log I get: tail -f /var/log/mail.log |grep milter DecĀ  5 11:23:03 mx-node2 postfix/cleanup[45922]: warning: connect to Milter service unix:/var/run/milter/milter-regex.sock: No such file or directory DecĀ  5 11:23:25 mx-node2 postfix/

[pfx] Milter XFORWARD question

2024-09-10 Thread Anton Hofland via Postfix-users
I have this milter that sits on a server which is not directly connected to the internet. Instead there is an internet facing firewall mail server in front of it which has all the usual defences. There are many reasons for this, some of which are just my preferences. Anyway, I use the XFORWARD cap

[pfx] milter round robin

2024-06-12 Thread Christian Zoffoli via Postfix-users
Hello, is there a way to use multiple milters in round-robin without using a load balancer? From what I can see in version 3.9, using multiple milters separated by commas results in them being used in sequence. ___ Postfix-users mailing list -- postf

[pfx] milter protocol: chgheader: wondering on indices

2024-04-25 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users
Hello. I am still writing my DKIM signer (or, actually, for over six weeks, i got distracted and ran away due to header remove code, and realization that all RFCs written after Y2K seem to introduce their own syntax rules instead of simply going for *822 or 2045, etc etc etc; including DKIM :().

[pfx] Milter multiline header formatting

2024-03-06 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users: > Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote in > <4tqh100n6pzj...@spike.porcupine.org>: > |Are you trying to say that Postfix represents a multiline message > |header as text with \n instead of \r\n? > > Yes. > > |That is very well possible. Postfix strips \n a

[pfx] milter: how about a SMFIP_NOQUIT?

2024-01-30 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users
Hello. I am currently writing my first ever milter, a yet postfix-only DKIM sign-only one. I want to do "that" (well: actually DKIM, not milter) for years but could not because i had "no I-M-F aka RFC 822/2822/5322 parser of acceptable quality". That has changed (quite a bit), but i will

[pfx] Milter own Postfix-prepended Received

2023-12-10 Thread Carlos Velasco via Postfix-users
Hello, I'm migrating a postfix server from "Before-Queue Content Filter" to "before-queue Milter". Postfix version is 3.8.3 The process is going well but I have found 2 weird things: 1. Postfix hides its own Postfix-prepended Received: header, for compatibility with Sendmail. This was unexpect

[pfx] milter SMFIC_ABORT instead of SMFIC_QUIT

2023-10-17 Thread mailmary--- via Postfix-users
Hello everyone, I'm coding a milter and I noticed an issue with postfix. Once postfix is done communicating with the milters, instead of sending a SMFIC_QUIT, it sends SMFIC_ABORT. abort all milters milter8_abort: abort milter inet:127.0.0.1:8891 milter8_abort: abort milter inet:127.0.0.1:889

[pfx] milter outgoing not working

2023-09-24 Thread Stanislav via Postfix-users
Greetings, After upgrading from postfix 3.7.3 to postfix 3.8.2, I've noticed my email is not signed with DKIM anymore. After further investigation, I've found that Postfix ignores milter on outgoing emails (incoming goes through milter ok). I use FreeBSD 13.2 . Does somebody experience this

[pfx] milter-greylist, run-as and permissions on freebsd

2023-05-24 Thread Gary Aitken via Postfix-users
New install of postfix on a freebsd 12.4 system. I have milter-greylist installed, set up in main.cf as: milter_protocol = 6 milter_default_action = accept smtpd_milters = local:/var/milter-greylist/milter-greylist.sock The socket to milter-greylist is at: $ ls -dl /var/milter-greylist/ d

[pfx] milter: could it splice (, somehow)?

2023-03-10 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users
Hello. Imagine the DKIM standard would be revised and extended a bit (to get rid of DMARC and ARC, even, could it be) to - sign the entire message as for now, - but include a "cramped=1" tag that signals that all receivers are actually covered by the DKIM signature, so - for any "RCPT TO:<>"