Re: [SOLVED] Re: SMTPD Configuration error

2015-06-24 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 05:06:10PM -0400, James B. Byrne wrote: > We run our own name-servers for our domains. In other words we have > the delegation for harte-lyne.ca, harte-lyne.com, and so forth. We > also have the delegation for our cat C netblocks and provide the DNS > reverse lookups form

Re: [SOLVED] Re: SMTPD Configuration error

2015-06-24 Thread James B. Byrne
On Tue, June 23, 2015 17:32, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 03:19:04PM -0400, James B. Byrne wrote: > >> >> smtp_tls_security_level = dane >> > >> > Not useful without: >> > >> >smtp_dns_support_level = dnssec >> > >> > and "127.0.0.1" as the only "nameserver" entry in /etc/r

Re: [SOLVED] Re: SMTPD Configuration error

2015-06-23 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 03:19:04PM -0400, James B. Byrne wrote: > >> smtp_tls_security_level = dane > > > > Not useful without: > > > > smtp_dns_support_level = dnssec > > > > and "127.0.0.1" as the only "nameserver" entry in /etc/resolv.conf > > and a validating resolver running on 127.0.0.1.

[SOLVED] Re: SMTPD Configuration error

2015-06-23 Thread James B. Byrne
On Mon, June 22, 2015 10:09, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 09:40:58AM -0400, James B. Byrne wrote: > >> However, postfix had already been >> under git control as a separate repository when etckeeper was >> installed and, unbeknownst to me git considered that a submodule so >> wh