Markus Benning:
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 11:46:10AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Reusing the same client socket for multiple policy clients requires
> > a reference-counting mechanism that is best implemented in the lower
> > layers of the Postfix infrastructure. It is a unlikely that one
> > P
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 11:46:10AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Reusing the same client socket for multiple policy clients requires
> a reference-counting mechanism that is best implemented in the lower
> layers of the Postfix infrastructure. It is a unlikely that one
> Postfix daemon process will
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 05:16:13PM +0200, Markus Benning wrote:
>
> > when running multiple checks in a policy daemon each check
> > needs to be running on a different port in the policy daemon
> > for the policy daemon to be able differentiate between the
> > checks when proces
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 05:16:13PM +0200, Markus Benning wrote:
> when running multiple checks in a policy daemon each check
> needs to be running on a different port in the policy daemon
> for the policy daemon to be able differentiate between the
> checks when processing the request.
>
> What a
Hello,
when running multiple checks in a policy daemon each check
needs to be running on a different port in the policy daemon
for the policy daemon to be able differentiate between the
checks when processing the request.
What about adding a "virtual servers" feature to the policy check
similar t
