Re: [PATCH] Domain RDN sequence substitution for LDAP search base.

2016-03-02 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Monday, October 07, 2013 3:16 PM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: --On Monday, October 07, 2013 6:07 PM + Viktor Dukhovni wrote: Note, the new "%" substitution pattern for a comma-separated list of DC= components is "%," not "%". I hope that's reasonably clear in the patch documen

Re: [PATCH] Domain RDN sequence substitution for LDAP search base.

2013-10-07 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Monday, October 07, 2013 6:07 PM + Viktor Dukhovni wrote: Note, the new "%" substitution pattern for a comma-separated list of DC= components is "%," not "%". I hope that's reasonably clear in the patch documentation. Yeah, it is quite clear, I was just adjusting the config on the

Re: [PATCH] Domain RDN sequence substitution for LDAP search base.

2013-10-07 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 11:02:35AM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: > Well, I can only speak to what Zimbra does. ;) As you guess, all of > our domains are in subtrees, so right now we use a search base of > "". So it certainly seems to me like your patch would allow the > LDAP queries to be mo

Re: [PATCH] Domain RDN sequence substitution for LDAP search base.

2013-10-07 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Wednesday, September 25, 2013 12:21 AM + Viktor Dukhovni wrote: If anyone is using LDAP for virtual hosting with a separate search base for each hosted domain using domain component RDNs, please reply on list whether the feature below is useful, and whether you tested the code and fou

[PATCH] Domain RDN sequence substitution for LDAP search base.

2013-09-24 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
If anyone is using LDAP for virtual hosting with a separate search base for each hosted domain using domain component RDNs, please reply on list whether the feature below is useful, and whether you tested the code and found that it works for you (once a handful of people respond that this is useful