On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 12:42 AM, Jack S wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have a problem that I am trying to resolve in emergency mode.
> I have a bunch of email in the derferred queue for a domain, their
> destination server will be down for a while so I need to create a way
> to get messages to them no
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 8/8/2012 4:22 AM, mailing list subscriber wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I asked this earlier but maybe skipped your attention.
>>
>> In summary,
>>
>> Why do body/header checks generate 5xx rejects even with soft
Hi,
I asked this earlier but maybe skipped your attention.
In summary,
Why do body/header checks generate 5xx rejects even with soft_bounce=yes?
Thanks.
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 1:21 AM, mailing list subscriber
wrote:
> Hi,
> I have two issues.
> After hard reading of MULTI_INSTAN
update: interesting, header_check gives 5xx but user unknown gives
correct 4xx response:
Jul 30 01:49:01 mailhost postfix-in/smtpd[3685]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from relay3.isp.ro[IP_ADDR]: 450 4.1.1 :
Recipient address rejected: User unknown;
from=
to= proto=ESMTP helo=
Ok, this¹ has been raised over a few times in the past, but I'm not
satisfied with the answer (referral to man page of lmtp/smtp instead
of idiot-proof narrative version like other *_README howtos).
1. Do the cached file contents still apply to current release version
of postfix?
2. If yes, why is
On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 08:27:12 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema
wrote:
> subscri...@viliar.net.ru:
>> On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 11:06:07 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema
>> wrote:
>> > Will this work? Unfortunately I can't test Postfix myself on every
>> > version of everything.
>> >
>> >Wietse
>> >
>> > *** ./
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 11:06:07 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema
wrote:
> Will this work? Unfortunately I can't test Postfix myself on every
> version of everything.
>
> Wietse
>
> *** ./dict_sqlite.c- Fri Jun 18 20:19:15 2010
> --- ./dict_sqlite.c Thu Sep 9 11:01:12 2010
> ***
> ***
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 11:06:07 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema
wrote:
> subscri...@viliar.net.ru:
>> > If you want Postfix to support the obsolete API then you
>> > cannot remove support for the preferred API.
>>
>> Sorry for delay with answer. I'll send this diff as workaround. Because
>> I'm not a prog
On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 10:43:56 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema
wrote:
> subscri...@viliar.net.ru:
>> On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 14:36:35 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema
>> wrote:
>> > subscri...@viliar.net.ru:
>> >> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 09:02:41 -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > On 8/2/2010 5:18
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 14:36:35 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema
wrote:
> subscri...@viliar.net.ru:
>> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 09:02:41 -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List
>> wrote:
>> > On 8/2/2010 5:18 AM, subscri...@viliar.net.ru wrote:
>> >> I use postfix with sqlite patch about 2 years with small fix to
>>
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 14:36:35 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema
wrote:
> subscri...@viliar.net.ru:
>> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 09:02:41 -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List
>> wrote:
>> > On 8/2/2010 5:18 AM, subscri...@viliar.net.ru wrote:
>> >> I use postfix with sqlite patch about 2 years with small fix to
>>
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 09:02:41 -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List
wrote:
> On 8/2/2010 5:18 AM, subscri...@viliar.net.ru wrote:
>> I use postfix with sqlite patch about 2 years with small fix to
function
>> name. I
>> suggest to make something like this for postfix 2.8. Or maybe check
>> sqlite
>> ve
(Looks like my previous letters has been failed to deliver. so I resend
it)
Due version of sqlite in CentOS5 last snapshots 20100618 and alter does
not compile
with next error:
dict_sqlite.c:71:2: error: #error "Your SQLite version is too old"
dict_sqlite.c: In function 'dict_sqlite_lookup':
dict
13 matches
Mail list logo
