On 12/3/2016 at 10:45 AM, "John Fawcett" wrote:
>
>On 12/03/2016 05:25 PM, rich.gre...@hushmail.com wrote:
>> Here I am, replying to my own post again. What I said in the
>prior post wasn't entirely true. I realized that I used the wrong
>password in my prior attempt. I am still granted acc
Here I am, replying to my own post again. What I said in the prior post wasn't
entirely true. I realized that I used the wrong password in my prior attempt.
I am still granted access to the SMTP service after authenticating in plaintext
on port 25.
So I'm somewhat confused how to prevent/dis
I suspected that was a typo. I figured it out.
I made those changes, when I attempt an AUTH LOGIN, I get back "535 5.7.8
Error: authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6" which seems to be appropriate.
So the user is no longer rewarded with access to the SMTP services when they
attempt to connect u
0 2.1.0 Ok
rcpt to:
250 2.1.5 Ok
data
354 End data with .
From:
To: Rich Greder
Subject: Testing
This is a test.
.
250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as BFDEB3FE30
quit
221 2.0.0 Bye
Connection closed by foreign host.
Okay, I'm made some exciting progress and I am grateful for the help. I will
show to people how I got this working
At first thought, I figured that it would simply be the IMAP password used by
Dovecot to access my mailbox. Not exactly true... I did some digging in some
blogs and the document
On 11/28/2016 at 4:56 PM, "Bill Cole"
wrote:
>
>On 28 Nov 2016, at 17:29, rich.gre...@hushmail.com wrote:
>
>> I changed it. When I compose and send to an outside domain now,
>I get
>> an error that hints towards port 25 being strongly preferred
>over 587.
>>
>> Sending of the message faile
On 11/28/2016 at 3:25 PM, "Viktor Dukhovni" wrote:
>
>On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 02:59:22PM -0600, rich.gre...@hushmail.com
>wrote:
>
>>
>>smtpd_tls_cert_file=/etc/letsencrypt/live/example.com/fullchain.pe
>m
>> >>
>smtpd_tls_key_file=/etcletsencrypt/live/example.com/privkey.pem
>> >
>> >The key
On 11/28/2016 at 1:28 PM, "Viktor Dukhovni" wrote:
>
>> On Nov 28, 2016, at 2:13 PM, rich.gre...@hushmail.com wrote:
>>
>> # TLS parameters
>> smtpd_tls_loglevel = 1;
>
>If that ';' is really there, get rid of it.
>
Got rid of it. C habits are hard to break. Good eye spotting that; mistakes
l
Okay,
Victor, thanks for the stats in the second email! That is quite interesting to
read. I have only recently (this summer) heard of LetsEncrypt.org. Up until
that point, I had expected that I was condemned by powers-that-be to buy a key
annually forever.
Oh yeah, I love the "smoke and m
Okay, I am already using letsencrypt.org for my port 443 traffic. So once I
have it extended to also cover SMPT on port 587, would it be acceptable to
disable port 25, or is port 25 still needed (perhaps to suggest to clients that
it isn't accepting any traffic except 587)
I have to admit, I ha
I should make clear in the post that u...@example.com is the IMAP mailbox name
and that m...@example.com is a virtual alias. This machine hosts about 8
domains and has, I think, three mailboxes. I am the sole user of the email
system.
On 11/28/2016 at 11:58 AM, rich.gre...@hushmail.com wrote:
Okay, I am really curious how this works then. Good catch on the 'www' test.
I winged it without reading the manpage. I've never known a good starting
point for learning DNS, so that is definitely a weak point. So, now that the
DNS is out of the way. I'm going to dig deeper here.
When I tr
Hello,
First, email has been working fine on this server for past several months while
using the Squirrelmail web client located on the same server. I am needing an
alternative method to access mail services and decided, on a whim, to try
Thunderbird. Thunderbird interacted with the Dovecot I
Okay,
I accidentally sent this half-composed. But yes. I was able to send via SMTP,
but only if my destination address was on my machine (which is probably good)
Maybe since I sent this, I let people deliver their opinions on if this is an
MX record issue first.
Thanks
Rick
On 11/28/2016 at
14 matches
Mail list logo
