On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 21:13:24 +
Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:07:51PM +0100, morbi...@rx900.org wrote:
>
> > Problem is that connections to 465 (with ssl/tls) appears in the logs
> > identical to 25 (with ssl/tls)
> > so that would lead to a
On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 20:58:51 +
Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 09:35:42PM +0100, morbi...@rx900.org wrote:
>
> > Currently my postfix server is accepting both cleartext and ssl/tls
> > connections on port 25, but my data center is introducing a new rule
On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 15:55:48 -0500 (EST)
wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
> morbi...@rx900.org:
> > Anonymous TLS connection established from xxx[yyy]: TLSv1.2 with cipher
> > ECDHE-RSA-AE
> > S128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)
> >
> > but that doesn
Hello, I am in the need to catch mail clients connecting to port 25 with
ssl/tls on my postfix server.
Currently my postfix server is accepting both cleartext and ssl/tls connections
on port 25,
but my data center is introducing a new rule (perhaps a new firewall)
which will drop ssl/tls connect