On 01/24/2014 12:41 PM, Francina Oates wrote:
> There are great reasons for using a SOCKS5 server:
> - perhaps your computer has a dynamic ip
> - perhaps your isp does not allow port 25 connections
> - perhaps you want an encrypted connection all the way to the
> recipient's mta, as opposed to have
I believe that is just how the milter protocol is supposed to work, in sendmail
as well as postfix.
Benoit Panizzon wrote:
>Hi
>
>Just to let you know if someone runs into the same problem...
>
>sender/recipient changes are not valid during the 'RCPT TO:' Milter
>phase
>(filter_recipient of MIM
I would implement this with a sieve script, if from is one of these allowed
emails, file into mailbox, else forward to another email and delete.
I plan on implementing this exact functionality for my daughter's emails when
they are old enough, then they can keep in touch with family and approved
I can't tell for sure because those emails are examples, but depending how you
get the recipient to delete in the first place, you might be getting it with
the wrong case, refer to this thread:
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/case-related-milter-bug-td62886.html#a62890
In short, the milter
It sounds like you need a milter (mail filter) to me, the easiest way to
write one I've found so far is by using python-libmilter:
http://stuffivelearned.org/doku.php?id=programming:python:python-libmilter
https://github.com/crustymonkey/python-libmilter
Of course, that's only if you prefer pytho
Hello,
I don't know if you want to go this far as it requires slight
customization, but my setup is postfix+postfixadmin+dovecot with
owncloud providing storage (webdav), calendar (caldav), and contacts
(carddav) as well as a nice web interface if you prefer to use that.
Roundcube provides webmail
A CAPTCHA isn't going to solve your problem either, my forums have
always had a rather hard-to-solve CAPTCHA enabled, and I too get
hundreds of these registrations per day with many dots @gmail.com
That said, I agree it'd be better to stop registrations from this format
in the first place, but thi
Agreed. Why would you want to discard my emails? :(
Is there something wrong with having an email named admin?
On 11/13/2013 10:01 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 11/13/2013 2:34 AM, naser sonbaty wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I need help with postfix regexp in header_checks.
>> I want discard all emails(any d
tfix's {rcpt_host} has the correct case
information (eXample.org, not example.org), so shouldn't {rcpt_addr}
contain it too? Especially since sendmail sends case information as well?
Either way, thanks for helping me get to the bottom of this!
On 11/08/2013 04:26 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
the transaction:
R
So is it possible your milter implementation pulls the email from this
later bit when it *should* pull it from the first bit?
I'm running short on ideas here. :/
On 11/08/2013 02:46 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> moparisthebest:
>> # try 2, should be filtered but is
[14:08:40] MAIL FROM: m...@example.org
[14:08:40] RCPT TO: g...@example.org
[14:08:40] RCPT TO: b...@example.org
[14:08:40] EOB
[14:08:40] bad_emails: ['b...@example.org']
[14:08:40] Close called. QID: None
Sorry for not including all of that the first time.
On 11/08/2013 01:17
Hello all,
I'm running postfix-2.9.6 on Ubuntu Server 12.04 LTS amd64.
I recently ran across a bug in postfix's milter implementation, shortly
after switching the server it was running on from sendmail to postfix.
This milter removes recipients that aren't in a whitelist, so I keep a
list of rec
12 matches
Mail list logo