[pfx] Re: Process and deliver email but return error to the client?

ust fulfill the requirements..." ;-) Thanks. -- Hawky Am 20.09.2024 16:25 schrieb Wietse Venema via Postfix-users: hawky--- via Postfix-users: Hi! I'm looking for a way to process and deliver an incoming email, but return an error (with a meaningful) message to the client. By looking

[pfx] Process and deliver email but return error to the client?

Hi! I'm looking for a way to process and deliver an incoming email, but return an error (with a meaningful) message to the client. By looking at the SMTP status codes (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_SMTP_server_return_codes) I don't see an obvious way to do that. But maybe it is possi

[pfx] [postfix] 3.4.23: SpamAssassin - Re-submission with sendmail - Append"receive_override_options = no_address_mappings"?

Hi, We've a SpamAssassin setup with the after-queue approach. When re-submission a mail, that has been content filtered by SpamAssassin, with sendmail we see that the mail is delivered twice to the recipient, if the user has a forwarding email set. From our understanding that is a result of

[pfx] Re: [postfix] 3.4.23: virtual, pipe and ${original_recipient} vs. ${recipient}

Thanks for your advice. Am 25.01.2024 22:56 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users: On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 04:48:39PM -0500, Bill Cole via Postfix-users wrote: > - Are you expected exactly one recipient per-invocation of the > spamassassin filter? I'm not sure how spamc handles multipl

[pfx] [postfix] 3.4.23: virtual, pipe and ${original_recipient} vs. ${recipient}

Hi, we're in the process to integrate SpamAssassin in our mail system. We decided to use the after-queue attempt with smtpd -o content_filter= The problem we're facing right now is that pipe is getting the alias name as recipient instead of the username - both are the same: postfix/pipe[