ust fulfill the requirements..." ;-)
Thanks.
--
Hawky
Am 20.09.2024 16:25 schrieb Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
hawky--- via Postfix-users:
Hi!
I'm looking for a way to process and deliver an incoming email, but
return an error (with a meaningful) message to the client.
By looking
aybe it is possible in a non-obvious
way?
Is it possible?
And if yes, can someone give me a hint howto implement?
Thank you.
--
Hawky
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
Hi,
We've a SpamAssassin setup with the after-queue approach.
When re-submission a mail, that has been content filtered by
SpamAssassin, with sendmail we see that the mail is delivered twice to
the recipient, if the user has a forwarding email set.
From our understanding that is a result of
Thanks for your advice.
Am 25.01.2024 22:56 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users:
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 04:48:39PM -0500, Bill Cole via Postfix-users
wrote:
> - Are you expected exactly one recipient per-invocation of the
> spamassassin filter? I'm not sure how spamc handles multipl
Hi,
we're in the process to integrate SpamAssassin in our mail system. We
decided to use the after-queue attempt with
smtpd -o content_filter=
The problem we're facing right now is that pipe is getting the alias
name as recipient instead of the username - both are the same:
postfix/pipe[
Hi,
just to wrap this up: The flags for lmtp were perfektly set, my "fault"
was to use dovecot lmtp instead of postfix lmtp for mailbox transport -
so no instance were setting the required message headers.
Wietse, thanks for your help!
Am 16.10.2022 14:11 schrieb Wietse Venema:
ha...@po
Hi,
we heavily use the alias feature and want to know who was the original
recipient for filtering. Our old postfix instance (version 2.11.3) set
this from the beginning - as far as I remember we never changed the
configuration to archive this.
Our new instance (version 3.5.13, not yet live)
Hi,
we're about to use Spamassassin in our postfix mail system. For that
reason we "copied" our mail system to a virtual machine in order to see
how Spamassassin is configured correctly.
After we enabled Spamassassin we're facing the problem that the virtual
table is evaluated a second time