[pfx] Re: Mails sent to rspamd twice

2024-09-09 Thread chandan via Postfix-users
On 2024-09-09 10:53, Danjel Jungersen via Postfix-users wrote: Hey! I have set up clamav, and I think it works But when a mail is recieved, it is first scanned by rspamd and then clamav. Thats all fine. But when clamav is done, rspamd scans it again. you are using amavis as content filte

[pfx] Re: Postfix ignores message id when threaded bounces are enabled if RFC-5322 header folding is used

2024-09-05 Thread chandan via Postfix-users
On 2024-09-05 12:27, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote: There is no hard requirement to fold at 78 characters, the limit is 998 bytes. And Message-Id SHOULD not be folded, even if over 78 bytes long. I think it is fine for Postfix to treat folded Message-IDs as malformed. Interestin

[pfx] Re: Do you reject DMARC failures?

2024-07-30 Thread chandan via Postfix-users
your experience on LLM for rspamd? Any links/resources are appreciated. Thank you On 2024-07-30 21:42, chandan via Postfix-users wrote: > In POSTSCREEN i use 12 blocklists and whitelists. each is given a > particular score based on a custom ML algorithm. The scores get > adjusted everyda

[pfx] Re: Do you reject DMARC failures?

2024-07-30 Thread chandan via Postfix-users
In POSTSCREEN i use 12 blocklists and whitelists. each is given a particular score based on a custom ML algorithm. The scores get adjusted everyday based on the performance of the RBLs. I don’t reject based on SPF, DMARC, or DKIM. However i do have spam detection powered by RSPAMD, which takes