wiped the config files when upgrading from Ubuntu 20 to
22, I found this tutorial to also be helpful.
https://www.linuxbabe.com/mail-server/setup-basic-postfix-mail-sever-ubuntu.
Brian
On 4/1/2023 6:09 PM, fh--- via Postfix-users wrote:
Hello,
if a domain is in virtual_alias_domains only, not in
On Thu, 2022-01-27 at 14:46 -0500, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> In the case
> of "import_environment" you really need to retain most of the
> default imports:
>
> import_environment =
> MAIL_CONFIG MAIL_DEBUG MAIL_LOGTAG TZ
> LANG=C POSTLOG_SERVICE POSTLOG_HOSTNAME
> # Thes
So the missing key here was not having "keytab:
/etc/postfix/smtp.keytab" in /etc/sasl2/smtpd.conf.
Interesting that this was not required in the previous version of
postfix/sasl/kerberos.
Cheers,
b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
I have a Postfix postfix-3.5.8 installation on EL8 which I just
recently upgraded from 2.10.1 on EL7.
The installation is configured to authenticate with GSSAPI and
accordingly has:
import_environment = KRB5_KTNAME=/etc/postfix/smtp.keytab
defined in main.cf. The /etc/postfix/smtp.keytab file i
,
Brian
--
Brian Sebby (se...@anl.gov<mailto:se...@anl.gov>) | Information Technology
Infrastructure
Phone: +1 630.252.9935| Business Information Services
Cell: +1 630.921.4305| Argonne National Laboratory
Is it possible to get logging from Cyrus LASL set to use *sasldb*?
I don't get much using *sasldb:*
Jan 12 12:55:06 SRV07 postfix/smtpd[6204]: connect from localhost[127.0.0.1]
Jan 12 12:55:27 SRV07 postfix/smtpd[6204]: warning: localhost[127.0.0.1]:
SASL login authentication failed: authenticati
FWIW, I was able to achieve my goal in what I think is a less-than-
optimal way:
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
...
spamc_cyrus unix - n n - - pipe
flags=R user=cyrus argv=/usr/bin/spamc -u ${user} -f -e
/usr/lib/cyrus-imapd/deliver
Hi.
Using Postfix 2.10.1, I currently have spamassassin configured as a
content filter with smtpd such as:
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd -o
content_filter=spamassassin
...
# spamassassin filtering
spamassassin unix - n n - - pipe
flags
/certfile.pem
-o smtpd_tls_cert_file=/path/to/certfile.pem
It seems to work pretty well for us. A wildcard certificate or one with
multiple subject alternate names will also work, but those tend to be more
expensive.
Brian
--
Brian Sebby (se...@anl.gov) | Infrastructure and Operation
), so the
hunt continues. Thank you again.
Wietse - nothing wrong with postfix.
Brian
On Apr 16, 2014, at 2:56 PM, Brian Grimal wrote:
> There is a regular ol’ iptables/linux box in front of this doing nat and
> state matching, didn’t think to poke around there. Thanks for the tip.
>
There is a regular ol’ iptables/linux box in front of this doing nat and state
matching, didn’t think to poke around there. Thanks for the tip.
Brian
On Apr 16, 2014, at 2:47 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>>
>
> Some firewall or load-balancer or similar device is losing connectio
here something else you think these remote hosts may be
expecting in the EHLO, and simply choosing not to continue the session? A
problem with TLS maybe? You know, the trouble seems to have started shortly
after disclosure of the heartbleed flaw in OpenSSL, perhaps related?
Brian
On Apr
postfix/trivial-rewrite[26512]: warning:
>> database /etc/postfix/virtual.db is older than source file /etc/$
>> Apr 16 21:26:28 hosted-by postfix/trivial-rewrite[26512]: fatal: open
>> database /etc/postfix/vmail_domains.db: No such file or direc$
>>
Brian
.../..uE..x.dU...
.S.I...
x.ddx.de
13:44:12.122955 IP 99.116.DDD.DDD.36399 > 172.16.5.8.25: tcp 0
E..4,.@.6...ct.../..uE..x.de..
.S.I...>
13:44:12.123084 IP 99.116.DDD.DDD.36399 > 172.16.5.8.25: tcp 0
E..4,.@.6...ct.../..uE..x.de..
.S.I...>
13:4
I’m banging my head on the desk over this one. Some hosts, fly right on
through - connect, ehlo, mail from, rcpt-to, data, quit .. done. All in maybe
1 second. Others, will consistently timeout after ehlo. I’ve telnetted into
the box from off-site (regular host, not a mail server), and it im
this list? adamli...@plexicomm.net
is in the from: header and that's a valid address which my server
could verify.
But you would never be able to read this list, or possibly any list, as
the From header is not modified but the list manager resends it as
owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org in the envelope.
Brian
e wheel?
I use the PEAR Mail class which includes SMTP and Sendmail delivery methods.
This already implements popen to sendmail or it can send via a full SMTP
transaction.
Brian
imeout (same as in the log below).
The smtp client process does not have support for the deprecated smtps
protocol (465) you are trying to use.
See if your smarthost supports TLS over submission (port 587) or use an
stunnel as documented here:
http://www.postfix.org/TLS_README.html#client_smtps
Brian
Wietse,
Thank you very much for your response. I'd mentioned that I'd tried this
approach in my first message. You are, however, correct.
I was misreading the maillog when I thought it was sending the message and
well as hitting my script. I need to look at the daemon/queue/service that
is loggi
I am trying to set up postfix to send bounced messages to an external script
to log the bounce to an external logging service so that we can monitor
bounce rates to different recipient domains. I want to keep the default
bounce behavior intact, so bounce notices are still send to the original
sende
menting out the home_mailbox parameter if you want
to use mbox to have local(8) save INBOX messages to /var/spool/mail.
Brian
On 5/21/2013 2:57 PM, Brian Evans wrote:
Installing Postfix alone will not let you read the mail. You need an
IMAP/POP3 client to read remotely which Postfix does not provide.
I mean IMAP/POP3 server such as courier, dovecot, etc.
d read the documentation
http://www.postfix.org/documentation.html .
Brian
Early on in this project we were given a requirement to allow our
members the ability to receive "messages" from our server via IMAP.
Someone assumed writing an IMAP server service would be simple and
that we w
parameter.
Brian
The log contains:
Apr 11 16:50:26 hilljaa5 postfix/qmgr[2563]: 0B60181F0:
from=mailto:h...@removed.com>>, size=310, nrcpt=1
(queue active)
Apr 11 16:50:26 hilljaa5 postfix/smtp[2569]: 0B60181F0:
to=mailto:t...@test.com>>, relay=test.test2.com
<http:/
have not provided any logs of a mail transaction.
We could only guess without it.
How is this mail being sent? Is it net based or through the sendmail(1)
command?
Brian
esses?) didn't work.
Here's postconf -n:
[snip]
smtpd_tls_auth_only = yes
smtpd_tls_cert_file = /big/www/ssl/www.cybernude.org_publickey.pem
smtpd_tls_loglevel = 3
unknown_local_recipient_reject_code = 550
You forgot the most important parameter, enabling TLS:
smtpd_tls_security_level = may
Brian
false"?
Postfix expects to receive no results (a.k.a. 0 rows) if a
virtual_mailbox_maps address in mysql does not exist.
Do not return "false", empty string, null, or any other value if it does
not exist.
Brian
10031,reject"
You cannot use spaces with in-line options in master.cf
Brian
But it does not work. The log gives this:
"Mar 21 14:16:52 aptget postfix/smtpd[13513]: fatal: parameter
"smtpd_recipient_restrictions": specify at least one working instance
of: check_relay_domains,
On 1/29/2013 1:43 PM, Brian Evans wrote:
Because of that, I have skewed numbers:
All "incoming" log records: 10187
All "status=sent" log records: 7506
All "status=deferred" log records: 3302
rejected: -621 (-6%)
It is not a simple math of "A minus B minus C&q
On 1/29/2013 1:29 PM, Mike. wrote:
On 1/29/2013 at 1:14 PM Brian Evans wrote:
|On 1/29/2013 1:07 PM, Mike. wrote:
|> I implemented the postscreen capability on a small MTA I run for
|> friends and family. Once I got postscreen configuration producing
the
|> results I wanted, I soon
can.sh: line 51: ${TmpFile}: ambiguous redirect
Changing mailqscan to mailqscan.XXX works.
Brian
rying to blacklist a SENDER.
Brian
o.
Did you add the auth socket in your dovecot configuration and restart
dovecot?
Brian
e that the mailbox is consistent during the migration.
Thanks,
Brian
client.
The message is deferred ("status=deferred") and will try again later.
This is one of the shortfalls of mbox format.
Brian
Hello:
On 11/5/2012 5:18 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 05.11.2012 03:45, schrieb Brian Schang:
>> What is the best way to handle a problem like this? Right now I'm
>> soft_bouncing until I find a more permanent solution. The best I've
>> found on the net is to s
there any tricks in setting this up correctly?
I'd appreciate any advice.
Thank you.
--
Brian
- - smtpd -o
content_filter=filter:dummyr
This is all documented in the POSTSCREEN_README.
Until you see postscreen lines in your syslog, it's not doing anything.
The ignore actions will let you check the log for what would be blocked.
Then you can use the enforce action to get results.
Brian
ago:
> Postfix by default rejects addresses starting with "-" to protect
> other software that might use the email address as a command-line
> parameter.
>
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#allow_min_user
>
>
>
> -- Noel Jones
Google search and Postfix documentation are your friend.
Brian
E-Mails from this server any longer. This is
for Admin E-Mails only
The REJECT verb itself prepends the reject code.
> Testing:
>
> telnet 127.0.0.1 smtp
> Trying 127.0.0.1...
> Connected to 127.0.0.1.
> Escape character is '^]'.
> 220 relayhost1.bombshellz.net ESMTP Postfix
> EHLO test
> 250-relayhost1.bombshellz.net
> 250-PIPELINING
> 250-SIZE
> 250-VRFY
> 250-ETRN
> 250-STARTTLS
> 250-AUTH PLAIN LOGIN
> 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
> 250-8BITMIME
> 250 DSN
> MAIL FROM: donts...@test.com
> 250 2.1.0 Ok
> QUIT
>
By default, Postfix applies restrictions during RCPT TO.
smtpd_delay_reject defaults to yes due to some poorly written software
that chokes if it receives a negative answer before RCPT TO stage.
That's why it's not yet an error.
Brian
> I am missing something here for this not to work properly and not
> quite sure what it is?
>
> Best Regards
>
>
t create/find a front-end that speaks SMTP as noted at the bottom
of the SMTPD_PROXY_README.
Brian
h the
> forwarding it's been made to a public dns server. Should I change it
> to a particular one? (ex spamhaus)
>
> Regards.
If you are running BIND named, you shouldn't need to forward.
It knows how to query directly.
If your provider blocks DNS requests, then you need to take it up with them.
Brian
n before RBL checks.
This will cut down the number of DNS queries which are limited amounts
for the free access.
Brian
xact
domain (without the host portion).
After the migration, I'll just re-point the MX records to the new
server, turn off the old server and remove the alias for "mail02" on the
new server.
Does anyone see any potential issues with this method?
Thanks,
Brian
On 08/15/2
d (relay / bounce?) their mail to the new server without affecting
the other users that will remain until the migration is complete.
The new mail server is going to answer to the same domain.
What would be the best way to do this?
Thanks in advance!
Brian
r authorized_submit_users
or http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#authorized_submit_users
The documentation is your friend.
Brian
e.net') LIMIT 1
Postfix expects an empty set (i.e. no rows returned) if it is to respond
negatively that a virtual alias does not exist.
Returning NULL does not equal no rows returned.
Brian
N.B. Test all suggested queries before putting into production,
including mine.
tfix self make the iniial setup layout schemas ?
>
>
>
No.
I personally changed my default databases to cdb and included support
for it.
I still compile with berkdb for btree support though.
Brian
-lpcre"
> and still so long log, sorry
>
> dict_pcre.c:61:18: error: pcre.h: No such file or directory
Same kind of issue as above. Incorrect pointer in CCARGS to find pcre.h.
Brian
> [root@mail]make -f Makefile.init makefiles \
> >CCARGS="-DHAS_DB -DUS
; in the AUXLIBS as noted in
http://www.postfix.org/MYSQL_README.html.
> 2 How can I support pcre, because I need the perl support.
Because you did not request it.
Please review http://www.postfix.org/PCRE_README.html
Brian
e correct parameter is tls_random_source
Version 2.9 is just simply alerting you to options that postconf, and
therefore Postfix,
does not understand or interpret from your config.
The alert is just there to tell you that expected behavior may not be as
intended.
`man 5 postconf` or review http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html for
correct names in the future.
Brian
s disabled.
Also, check the permissions of /opt, /opt/ema, AND /opt/ema/sockets to
make sure the postfix user has access.
Brian
>
> This is the postconf -n output
> selinux is not enabled
>
>
> alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
> alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
> append_
is open xchange.
>
> Any idea ?
I think you should FIX the authentication of webmail.
Webmail is a source of exploits especially if it is public facing.
The more information you have of which account is leaking, the better
you will be in the future.
Brian
On 6/8/2012 7:47 AM, Achal tomar wrote:
> ok so how can i change he return path dynamically for each
> user when he/she sends a mail,so that he return path includes his/her
> user ID and also the to: header information,i want to do this in
> postfix and i am using centOS 5 as an OS.
This is calle
README.html#after_220
This causes 4XX replies to clients not yet on the temporary whitelist as
documented.
If this does not suit you, please reread the documentation and make the
necessary changes.
Brian
> Service currently unavailable doesn't make sense as a rejection
> message. Is it r
197553 mail.info]
> C41391CD00: uid=34001 from=
>
This mail entered via the pickup service (aka via the sendmail(1) command).
smtpd_sender_restrictions will never apply to anything except mail
received through smtpd.
Brian
he same line
>
I hope you are not trying to implement a poor man's language filter.
If so, you will probably run into a clbuttic (read: classic with poor
filter) example of what not to do.
Brian
rly not as a transport map). Instead just
>> change your smtpd_recipient restrictions like this:
>> smtpd_recipient_restricitons = permit_mynetworks
>> reject_unauth_destination reject_unlisted_recipient ... As Brian
>> already explained, it's the default to reject undefin
MTAs will continue delivering the message.
Many MUAs will alert the user that they have an error, though some may
continue.
Brian
On 5/15/2012 9:44 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 09:17:16AM +0200, Andreas Oster wrote:
>> # Allow maximum mail size 40GB
>> message_size_limit = 4048
> The comment is wrong. 4048 is only 40MB. Good, because most sites
> will not accept any multi-GB mail.
In addition, be car
On 4/17/2012 3:55 PM, n756...@50mail.com wrote:
>
> FROM: "n###@###.com"
> TO: b...@domain.com, m...@domain.com
>
> For that message send, postfix logs on my end show:
>
> Apr 17 11:52:48 mail postfix/smtpd[23367]: connect from
> smtp.myprovider.com[1.2.3.4]
> Apr 17 11:52:48
On 4/13/2012 1:27 PM, Kizito Thomas wrote:
> Thank you Ansgar,
> Does it mean I cannot use this method to block un desirable mails this
> way?
> At first I tried using the method explained on
> http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/howto-blacklist-reject-sender-email-address/
> but this could not allow post
f Mailscanner.
The former uses either the milter, before-queue or after-queue methods
which exist in Postfix.
The latter uses an unsupported direct queue manipulation which is not
guaranteed to work correctly in Postfix.
Brian
y idea what that means. Could you please
> explain a little further what I'm supposed to do here.
>
You are using the deprecated 1.x syntax of check_relay_domains.
It is recommended to use reject_unauth_destination instead of
check_relay_domains.
Your mail log may even indicate this as a warning.
Brian
ap:/etc/postfix/ldap.cf" output (where ldapuseralias is one of your ldap
> users)?
This is good advice for testing and you should follow it.
Just be sure to test the bare user name, like joe from my previous example.
Brian
On 12-03-27 03:30 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* brian:
2.8.5-2~build1 (Ubuntu)
Does anyone have an idea what might be going on with $myhostname here?
$ postconf -h myhostname
demeter.DOMAIN.org
Mar 26 23:36:03 demeter postfix/smtpd[15657]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from bas10-montrealak
2.8.5-2~build1 (Ubuntu)
Does anyone have an idea what might be going on with $myhostname here?
$ postconf -h myhostname
demeter.DOMAIN.org
Mar 26 23:36:03 demeter postfix/smtpd[15657]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
bas10-montrealak-1128580898.dsl.bell.ca[67.68.199.34]: 504 5.5.2
: Helo command r
On 12-03-26 01:39 AM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
* brian:
$ sudo testsaslauthd -u test -p test
0: OK "Success."
Your test is misleading, because it tests a different SASL setup.
testsaslauthd tests saslauthd authentication while you have configured Cyrus
SASL to have libsasl acc
I'm having trouble with SASL when relaying and don't know if the problem
is with the client (thunderbird), the server, or the fact I've been at
this for going on 12 hours now.
shortened log entries:
SSL_accept:before/accept initialization
...
SSL_accept:SSLv3 read finished A
Reusing old sessio
ing I can do better in this
> regard, just say so!)
>
> I ssh to my server and use sendmail to send mails, that's why I set up that
> odd smtpd_sender_restrictions. smtpd_sender_restrictions is necessary,
> because otherwise I would end up as an open relay, right?
The sendmail(1) command does not use smtpd options what so ever. It
uses the pickup daemon.
Brian
39]: 6F3FBE4079: reject: header From: "ts2"
> from mta319.sina.net[202.108.3.196];
> from= to= proto=ESMTP
> helo=: 5.7.1 message content rejected
>
Read the message more closely: 'reject: header From: "ts2"'
Do you have a header_checks active that match a From rule?
Brian
rs and upset my users who want
> their more important mail.
Perhaps you would like to rate limit certain IPs?
If so, you could apply the above map and, instead of rejecting, perform
a check_policy_service action along with something like Postfwd.
A policy server could also be global depending o
On 2/28/2012 1:54 PM, Steve Campbell wrote:
>
>
> On 2/28/2012 12:25 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
>> On 2/28/2012 11:48 AM, Steve Campbell wrote:
>>> I'm new to postfix so I've got a lot of learning to do.
>> Welcome to Postfix.
>>
ee all of the default options, use 'postconf -d'. For reference
only as we mostly know the defaults.
Brian
tual_transport
The purpose of virtual_mailbox_maps in a delivery agent other than
virtual(8) is for VERIFICATION that a user exists. If it is left empty,
no verification is done. The result just has to be non-empty for
verification to occur. This is a possible BACKSCATTER source when left
empty
On 2/15/2012 11:57 AM, Jack Knowlton wrote:
> On Wed, February 15, 2012 5:37 pm, /dev/rob0 wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 03:50:00PM +0100, Jack Knowlton wrote:
>>> I'm looking into implementing a check_recipient_access as a table
>>> inside a MySQL database. It's basically a list of users that
On 2/8/2012 12:07 PM, Mr fix wrote:
> Just tried that brute force and worked.your reference validates the issue.
>
> These things generally happen when we jump 4 versions in one shot, thank you
> very much for pitching in.
>
> We have multiple instances running so as per older way they distrib
On 1/31/2012 9:54 AM, Eric Jacobs wrote:
> Hi folks -
>
> I'm new to postfix. Been working with sendmail forever but for a new
> mailserver my boss (actually his boss) has a thing for postfix and
> against sendmail. So I'm scrambling to learn.
>
> One thing that has come up is that in the near fut
On 1/18/2012 12:10 PM, Jon August wrote:
> On Jan 18, 2012, at 11:59 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
>
>> On 1/18/2012 11:41 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> Am 18.01.2012 17:36, schrieb Jon August:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> We
On 1/18/2012 12:05 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 18.01.2012 17:59, schrieb Brian Evans - Postfix List:
>> On 1/18/2012 11:41 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> Am 18.01.2012 17:36, schrieb Jon August:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> We have a postfix machin
> * add the ip to "mynetworks"
> * add
> "smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes,permit_sasl_authenticated,permit_mynetworks,reject"
> in master.cf
>
I don't think that "master.cf" line is valid.
Wouldn't this be better?
In main.cf:
mynetworks = 127.0.0.1, A.B.C.D
smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_sasl_authenticated,
permit_mynetworks, reject
Brian
On 12/13/2011 2:17 PM, Gonzo Fernandez wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm not too familiar with postfix but our server seems to stop sending
> emails usually only on the weekends. The rest of the week it's fine
> but once it gets to about Saturday/Sunday morning it gets stuck. I've
> come in usually on Mond
ient sbl.spamhaus.org,
>reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org,
> permit
Permit at then end is harmless as it is also implied if all others pass.
Suggest reviewing all RBLs. Some are dead, and some can be combined.
zen.spamhaus.org will include (sbl|xbl|pbl).spamhaus.org
xbl.spamhaus.org includes cbl.abuseat.org
Brian
On 11/30/2011 1:13 PM, Peter Tselios wrote:
> Thank you Brian,
>
> Sorry, to bug you, but, do you have any link to read how to enable the SMTP
> Auth? My plan is to enable it (first for selected users and later for all
> users (in the openLDAP). All "how-tos" I have fo
Many administrators enforce (require) SASL on the submission port (587)
as well as options to use TLS.
Brian
On 11/22/2011 6:35 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Mark Goodge :
>> I am suffering from AOL numpties who click "this is spam" on
>> notification emails they get (by their request!) from a forum and
>> mailing list hosted on my server. In order to trap these, I've set up
>> a feedback loop with AOL
yslog daemon or, perhaps, your OS vendor.
Brian
temail"@box.com, "&testem"@mail.com,
> "#test"@ju.com as well"$firstem...@box.com" - but no use.
Aliases allows "$firstemail" or "&testem" or "#test". You MUST NOT
include the domain part.
As always, aliases(5) maps are only used for those users that are
delivered by the local(8) delivery agent.
Brian
On 11/10/2011 7:26 AM, Amira Othman wrote:
Hi all
I have configured two instances of postfix 2.8 and it’s working fine
but I want to separate logs of each instance to be different than the
other instance .
How can I do that?
Regards
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#syslog_name
Rea
ject_unknown_hostname are ignored once the config is fully read.
I highly suggest running 'postconf -n' and reviewing the results.
Brian
pient.
Unfortunately, you seem to have missed the important welcome message:
"TO REPORT A PROBLEM, PLEASE SEE
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail";
So, are you verifying an account is on a remote box? That is what
reject_unverified_recipient is for.
If you want to reject virtual users on the current box, you want
reject_unlisted_recipient.
Without more details, it's hard to help you.
Brian
aining the queue, you need to
re-queue all messages using 'postsuper -r ALL'
This will make Postfix reexamine every message and put them through all
current content filters again.
Brian
s.
If you need a new feature, there are few choices except to move forward.
Brian
quires Postfix 2.6 or later.
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_mandatory_tls_protocols --
this one is for mandatory i.e. "encrypt"
Brian
s.
Do NOT put them in alias_maps for virtual users instead use your current
virtual alias map.
Or, add an additional map for ease of administration.
Please remember, virtual alias maps are recursive.
Brian
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
> [mailto:own
On 8/30/2011 4:32 PM, Tim Eberhardt wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 30. August 2011, 16:08:35 schrieb Brian Evans - Postfix List:
>> According to the sources (2.8.4 as a reference),
>> mailbox_size_limit is a signed 32-bit integer. (On x86(_64) arch)
>>
>> global/mail
On 8/30/2011 3:23 PM, Tim Eberhardt wrote:
> # postconf -n | grep mailbox_size_limit
> mailbox_size_limit = 4294967296
>
> I tried reducing the number which worked and the errors siappeared:
>
> # postconf -n | grep mailbox_size_limit
> mailbox_size_limit = 20
>
> What could be the cause to
creen with a low score and not a flat reject.
Better, don't use it at all.
[/opinion]
Brian
happens AFTER EHLO.
So it becomes an out of sequence for the protocol. Therefore, not possible.
Brian
On 8/8/2011 2:29 PM, Stephen Atkins wrote:
> Hello everyone. I've been searching around trying to figure this out
> but it just eluding me. We've been getting a ton of mail from a
> certain domain which is all spam. Problem is that our mail system is
> also generating a bounce for each try. I w
1 - 100 of 665 matches
Mail list logo
