Re: Are non_smtpd_milters applied to mail delivered via smtpd?

2023-01-24 Thread Yannik Sembritzki
On 25.01.23 01:48, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: You are right. The milter is called twice, because a FILTER (spamassassin in this case) is applied, after which the message is re-injected using pickup, which triggeres the second milter run during cleanup. (Still, I think the graphic on the MILT

Re: Are non_smtpd_milters applied to mail delivered via smtpd?

2023-01-24 Thread Yannik Sembritzki
On 24.01.23 23:09, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote: No. The Postfix documentation says: non_smtpd_milters (default: empty) A list of Milter (mail filter) applications for new mail that does not arrive via the Postfix smtpd(8) server. This includes local submission via the sendmail(1) command line, new

Re: Are non_smtpd_milters applied to mail delivered via smtpd?

2023-01-24 Thread Yannik Sembritzki
On 24.01.23 23:15, EML wrote: I don't think there's any way to get bounces through the milters, short of rewriting the bounce code. Have a look at the "Signing internally-generated bounce messages" paragraph on https://www.postfix.org/MILTER_README.html. /internal_mail_filter_classes = bounce

Are non_smtpd_milters applied to mail delivered via smtpd?

2023-01-24 Thread Yannik Sembritzki
Hi everyone, I'm currently investigating a situation that milters are called twice, once by smtpd, and once by cleanup, when both smtpd_milters and non_smtpd_milters are configured (to the same values). The graphic on https://www.postfix.org/MILTER_README.html suggests that this is normal be

Re: encrypt incoming emails with my public gpg key

2015-06-03 Thread Yannik Sembritzki
I agree with Thomas on this. If someone is spying on the server, any past and future emails can be stolen. In case all incoming mails are PGP-encrypted on the server, future emails can still be stolen, but atleast any past correspondence is secure. Yannik Am 03.06.2015 um 03:50 schrieb Sebastian

Re: Logging local port used for connection

2015-05-25 Thread Yannik Sembritzki
> No. Parameter expansion is recursive, and this yields an infinite loop. > The default value is never used when you override a parameter. > > You need to cut/paste the default value into the replacement. There > is no support for prepend or append. I see. Yannik

Re: Logging local port used for connection

2015-05-24 Thread Yannik Sembritzki
Hi Noel, > If you have postfix listening on several ports and want to know > which port the client connected to, you can set a different syslog > name to differentiate them in the logs. For example, it's common to > set ' -o syslog_name=postfix/submission' on the port 587 submission > listener. I

Re: problem with spam

2015-05-24 Thread Yannik Sembritzki
just out of curiosity: wouldn't this also block legitimate users who use a third party mailserver on port 25? Am 24. Mai 2015 13:23:01 MESZ, schrieb Christos Chatzaras : >Thank you everyone for the replies. I think I found the problem. The >spambot (uploaded by hacked websites) does direct conne

Logging local port used for connection

2015-05-09 Thread Yannik Sembritzki
Hi everyone, is it possible at all to log the local port that is used for a connection? There is "smtpd_client_port_logging" but this seems to only log the remote port. greetings Yannik