That makes sense. Thanks a lot!
On 15 December 2013 23:19, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Vasya Pupkin:
>> I had an entry in virtual_alias_maps like this:
>>
>> /^([A-Za-z0-9%._-]+)@comain.tld$/ spam-123123...@mailinator.com
>
> This replaces addresses with spam-123123...@ma
I checked config many times, it's perfect. I also mentioned that new
mail is processed correctly. So for some reason requeue is not working
as intended. Anyway, here are all my config files attached.
On 15 December 2013 22:48, Dominik George wrote:
>> > Because oif [0]. The queue you are requeuei
So there is no way to do what I want to do then?
On 15 December 2013 22:42, Dominik George wrote:
>> But for some crazy reason postfix keeps trying to deliver all mail to
>> mailinator.com instrad of mail.ru. What am I doing wrong? Also, I
>> tried to send new mail to t...@comain.tld and it went
Hello.
I am using postfix 2.8.5 on ubuntu 10.04 with pcre virtual_alias_maps,
like this:
virtual_alias_maps = pcre:/etc/postfix/virtual_alias_maps
I had an entry in virtual_alias_maps like this:
/^([A-Za-z0-9%._-]+)@comain.tld$/ spam-123123...@mailinator.com
Today mailinator.com went down and
Hello.
I wonder, how postfix handles multiple entries like this:
reject_rbl_client hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com=127.0.0.2,
reject_rbl_client hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com=127.0.0.4,
Will it try to lookup address every time, or it is smart and will use
previous lookup result to compare with
> In particular, if a bounce is caused by a downstream MTA rejecting
> an email because it's too large, then that's an unavoidable bounce.
> But it's also unlikely to be backscatter
In my case it was one of the most reasons why my server acted as a
backscatterer.
PM +0400, Vasya Pupkin wrote:
>> You of course understand that this is not possible, right?
>
> Yes, I am sure he does. That was sarcasm. Anyway,
>
> If the amount of backscatter is small, do not change behaviour. But
> accept the fact that (prepare for) you might get blacklisted
You of course understand that this is not possible, right?
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Vasya Pupkin:
>> I'm doing best I can to fight spam.
>
> Then you will have to predict what mail will be rejected down-stream.
> Let me know when
I just got an idea to use smtp_header_checks to discard mail from
postmas...@mydomain.tld which is used for bounce emails. I hope it
will work.
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
> Vasya Pupkin wrote:
>>
>> Hello.
>>
>> First, I have spent tw
, b.barracudacentral.org, and some more, and some
Postfix internal check including reject_non_fqdn_sender,
reject_non_fqdn_recipient, reject_unknown_sender_domain, and some
more.
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Mikael Bak wrote:
> Vasya Pupkin wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> First, I have spent two
ul 22, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Vasya Pupkin:
>> Hello.
>>
>> First, I have spent two days reading articles and searching web for
>> solution but failed there. I am using postfix as an mx for my domains,
>> it accpets mail for different addresses withing
Hello.
First, I have spent two days reading articles and searching web for
solution but failed there. I am using postfix as an mx for my domains,
it accpets mail for different addresses withing my domains which is
then forwarded to other external domains, i.e. google.com and other
mail services. M
12 matches
Mail list logo
