Hi,
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 03:43:21PM +0200, DTNX Postmaster wrote:
> On Jun 6, 2012, at 13:16, Toni Mueller wrote:
> > In main.cf, this looks like follows:
> >
> > mtp_sasl_auth_enable = yes
>
> Is the above a typo in your configuration, or a copy-paste error?
>
Hi,
I recently upgraded a machine from Postfix 2.8 to 2.9. The machine uses,
amongst other things, a custom transport to facilitate masking outgoing
email addresses and sending with SMTP-AUTH.
In main.cf, this looks like follows:
mtp_sasl_auth_enable = yes
smtp_sender_dependent_authentication =
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 01:26:45PM -0500, john wrote:
> I realize that this is really the job of the MUA, but I would like
> to check that emails are in fact encrypted before being sent.
this can be ensured by running the emails through a (specialized)
content filter.
> suitable message/cod
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 06:35:11PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 17.02.2012 18:31, schrieb Simon Hintermann:
> > SENDER (a...@toto.com) sends an email to b...@domain.com
> > ||
> > v
> > WEBSERVER (b...@domain.com forwards all mails to b...@yahoo.com)
> > ||
> > v
> > MAIL GATEWAY (local domai
Hi,
I would like to modify the envelope sender address depending on the
target domain(s) I'm sending to. 'generic' doesn't appear to be
applicable. If possible, I'd also like to set a default rewriting rule
other than "pass the envelope unmodified".
I'm currently on Postfix 2.7.1.
TIA!
Kind
[ resent for thread stability =8( ]
Hi,
On Fri, 24.09.2010 at 13:05:27 -0400, Wietse Venema
wrote:
> Then you made a mistake somewhere. The transport map is used late
> in the mail routing machinery.
>
> To debug:
>
> $ postmap -q u...@example.com pgsql:/etc/postfix/transport_maps
>
> The ou
Hi,
On Fri, 24.09.2010 at 13:05:27 -0400, Wietse Venema
wrote:
> Then you made a mistake somewhere. The transport map is used late
> in the mail routing machinery.
>
> To debug:
>
> $ postmap -q u...@example.com pgsql:/etc/postfix/transport_maps
>
> The output should look like "local:" or "
Hi,
while setting up my first Postfix (2.7) server on a Debian/Lenny
system, along with Dovecot (1.2.x), with most tables maintained in a
PostgreSQL database, I've hit a problem in the mail delivery part (as
opposed to receiving mail) for which I can't see a good solution. Some
advice and/or poin
Hi,
On Sun, 17.01.2010 at 09:00:13 -0800, Daniel L. Miller
wrote:
> re-invent them or add processing time. Using port 587 is a good
> thought to pre-validate local senders - but I want to support
> verified remote senders as well - so I need a more universal
> solution.
we are doing this - ou
