Am Dienstag 19 Juli 2011, 22:20:25 schrieb mouss:
> Le 19/07/2011 09:05, Jeroen Geilman a écrit :
> > On 2011-07-19 00:31, mouss wrote:
> >> Le 18/07/2011 19:01, Jeroen Geilman a écrit :
> >>> On 2011-07-17 20:19, mouss wrote:
> >>>> Le 17/07/2011 12:
Am Sonntag 17 Juli 2011, 21:34:23 schrieb Reindl Harald:
>
> Am 17.07.2011 21:25, schrieb Thomas Zehbe:
> > Am Sonntag 17 Juli 2011, 21:14:43 schrieb Reindl Harald:
> >> you are having EIGHT years a software in production use
> >> with connection to the interent? ar
Am Sonntag 17 Juli 2011, 21:14:43 schrieb Reindl Harald:
>
> Am 17.07.2011 20:08, schrieb Thomas Zehbe:
> > Am Sonntag 17 Juli 2011, 19:55:03 schrieb Wietse Venema:
> >> Thomas Zehbe:
> >>> Ancient version maybe a good point. It is an old machine. Version is
Am Sonntag 17 Juli 2011, 19:55:03 schrieb Wietse Venema:
> Thomas Zehbe:
> > Ancient version maybe a good point. It is an old machine. Version is 2.0.14.
> > "Less painful" sounds like that there is a method to solve this?
>
> Postfix 2.0 was released eight years
Am Sonntag 17 Juli 2011, 14:02:36 schrieb Bastian Blank:
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 12:49:11PM +0200, Thomas Zehbe wrote:
> > I have an installtion using bitdefender as a virus scanner using the
> > content_filter option.
> > bitdefender's smtp daemon listens on port 1
Am Sonntag 17 Juli 2011, 13:33:37 schrieb Reindl Harald:
>
> Am 17.07.2011 12:49, schrieb Thomas Zehbe:
> > Hello List,
> >
> > I have an installtion using bitdefender as a virus scanner using the
> > content_filter option.
> > bitdefender's smtp
er a dozen hours of research any hint would be appreciated.
Regards,
Thomas Zehbe
