Wietse Venema wrote:
> This is an output buffering problem. You need to flush output
> after each reply, perhaps by calling the flush() function.
Good catch, I guess this could most likely be his problem!
--
mail: tho...@gelf.net
web: http://thomas.gelf.net/
Mathias Tausig wrote:
> I want to write an after-queue content filter for my postfix
> installation which is invoked by spawn (according to the FILTER_README
> from postfix.org).
>
> My problem is, that the input/output part simply does not work. I am
> sending a "220 localhost SMTP foo" to STDOUT
t is needed to folks starting to use
> DKIM. Actually, at least, i needed that progress (reading RFCs) ;;
I did so. I've entirely read RFC 4871, 5617, 5672, many others and
also current drafts regarding DKIM deployments. I can confirm that
the answer to his question is not to be found in any
Noel Jones wrote:
> The entire header (up to a sanity limit) is logged; no further action is
> necessary.
Great, thanks again!
Noel Jones wrote:
> To log an existing header, use the header_checks WARN action.
> http://www.postfix.org/header_checks.5.html
Thank you!
> The log entry would look something like:
> Aug 12 10:29:59 mgate2 postfix/cleanup[29258]: 7C773797ADF: warning:
> header X-Info-Messageid: l6oL1rHPRUyklkQzd
Thomas Gelf schrieb:
> If I didn't missunderstand him he already has those X-Info-MessageID
> headers in his mail headers, what he wants is Postfix to do is writing
> them to syslog.
That's what happens if you're at phone while writing :-/
It should read: "...alrea
hose X-Info-MessageID
headers in his mail headers, what he wants is Postfix to do is writing
them to syslog.
While this would probably be pretty easy with Amavis, I have no idea if
and how he could do so using Postfix only.
Best regards,
Thomas Gelf
http://www.google.com
http://www.altavista.com/
http://www.bing.com
http://www.yahoo.com
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_search_engine
fake...@fakessh.eu wrote:
> how to have amavisd-new dkimproxy , and implemented
> in master.cf and main.cf
specifying an alternative to
> syslog. Is there any way to do this?
You should keep syslog, there are many reasons why it is better than
"just a file". But replace your syslogd with syslog-ng or rsyslog, and
then write logs for your parser to a pipe.
Best regards,
Thomas Gelf
LuKreme wrote:
> On Aug 4, 2009, at 3:42, Thomas Gelf wrote:
>
>> the person who did not correctly set up the network is to be blamed,
>> if you have equipment acting as MTA it should be configured the right
>> way, otherwise use a relay server
>
> SHOULD be b
brian moore wrote:
> There is always the "AOL Rule".
Yeah, we are sometimes also using AOL as an example, even if where I
live nearly nobody is using it...
> (Hotmail and Gmail have similar rules, I just don't know where they
> spell them out.)
Hotmail: http://postmaster.msn.com/Guidelines.aspx
ite is behaving wrong, you are just
enforcing MTAs to respect a small subset of current standards.
Regards,
Thomas Gelf
meet missconfigured hosts, and be prepared to add
exceptions to your config (Hash file, DB, whatever). Many public
entities are running badly configured systems - they'll NOT fix them
and your customers will insist on receiving their mail. Therefore you
will need a "whitelist"-feature.
Best regards,
Thomas Gelf
Charles Marcus wrote:
> But seriously... there is nothing stopping anyone else from customizing
> their banner to show the same thing, right?
Sure. You should keep "ESTMP" in your banner - the rest is up to you.
Add
> smtpd_banner = I think ESMTP is a prehistorical protocol
to your main.cd to re
Clunk Werclick wrote:
> Thank you Thomas. I stick with Mysql and worry if I ever have to set up
> a server so big it fails. If that happens I have lots of £$£ and pay
> someone else to do it whilst I sit on beach sipping wine.
Once that happens: let me know! I'll join you at the beach and configur
Clunk Werclick wrote:
> That is very reassuring Thomas, thank you.
>
> Now I don't know if I should stay with SQL or drop to maps ? It is
> easier to configure with SQL from a web based front end - but to get SQL
> to dump to flat files and Postmap is also only a few Perl lines. What is
> a fool
but that's mostly as of disaster recovery
and failover reasons - you could handle similar traffic also on a single
host (using recent server hardware).
A certain percentage of queries could of course be avoided if Postfix
where optimized for DB usage. As we know it isn't - this design choice
however keeps it flexible and simple.
Best regards,
Thomas Gelf
I assume you're using this certificate for TLS, so the answer is NO, no
single mails will be encrypted - TLS is "only" there to allow MTA's to
encrypt their transport layer. If no restrictions are configured this
happens automagically if both endpoints support TLS.
Best
ith no clear answers.
ATRN/ODMR is afaik not provided by Postfix, you could give a quick look
at http://plonk.de/sw/odmr/ - however I never tried it.
Regards,
Thomas Gelf
19 matches
Mail list logo
