Victor Duchovni morganstanley.com> writes:
> Wietse, if I understand correctly, wants to ensure that the issue is
> clearly defined, so we don't solve the wrong one, and is worth fixing.
Naturally.
> Why does your Dovecot intermittently SIGBUS?
It doesn't. The deliver binary was truncated, maki
Jeroen Geilman adaptr.nl> writes:
> I completely agree that non-delivery to a (presumably dependable) MDA
> should never error out, but I thought a soft solution would be better
> than choosing the more extreme route (of altering working code).
I believe the code is not working as intended and
On Jul 13, 2010, at 7:03 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> What are the symptoms of the problem?
postfix/pipe[22169]: 5991748: to=, relay=dovecot, delay=1.9,
delays=1.8/0.05/0/0.03, dsn=5.3.0, status=bounced (Command died with signal 7:
"/usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver")
postfix/bounce[22171]: 5991748: s
HISTORY, 20061207:
Compatibility with Postfix < 2.3: undo the change to bounce
instead of defer after pipe-to-command delivery fails with
a signal. File: global/pipe_command.c.
Part 1: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.postfix.user/154616
Part 2 (tested with Postfix 2.6.6):
--- src/
