[pfx] Re: Process and deliver email but return error to the client?

anges with completely new IPs. There would be nothing to reset. If you had to say hello to every postmaster in the world before he accepts your mails, e-mail would be useless. Stephan -- |If your life was a horse, you'd have t

[pfx] Re: disable authentication on port 25

Am Fr, Mai 24, 2024 at 15:12:31 +0200 schrieb Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users: Stephan Seitz via Postfix-users skrev den 2024-05-24 15:01: Carefull, if you have „smtpd_tls_auth_only = yes” (I think), then you’ll see AUTH after STARTTLS… port 25 must not be tls only I didn’t say that, but

[pfx] Re: disable authentication on port 25

you have „smtpd_tls_auth_only = yes” (I think), then you’ll see AUTH after STARTTLS… Stephan -- |If your life was a horse, you'd have to shoot it.| ___ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an

Re: Mail delivery times: SASL vs permit_mynetwork

obvious because the tests wouldn’t be really comparable with different systems. It was always the same client, the same server and the same network connectivity. I only changed $mynetworks and the php script. Many greetings, Stephan -- |If your life was a horse, you'd have to

Re: Mail delivery times: SASL vs permit_mynetwork

(even if login and password is sent only once), then I would understand. But I won’t debug the problem any further. It doesn’t seem to be that obvious so it isn’t really worth it. Many greetings, Stephan -- |If your life was a horse, you'd have to shoot it.|

Re: Mail delivery times: SASL vs permit_mynetwork

different options for smtpd and submission. So the only difference in the SMTP session should be the AUTH command. Many greetings, Stephan -- |If your life was a horse, you'd have to shoot it.|

Re: Mail delivery times: SASL vs permit_mynetwork

On Di, Sep 01, 2020 at 09:27:03 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: Stephan Seitz: If my client IP is part of mynetworks the time for 500 mails is about 29 seconds. That's 5.8ms per delivery. If [not in mynetworks] the time is about 47 seconds. That's 9.4ms per delivery. Looks like yo

Mail delivery times: SASL vs permit_mynetwork

beginning, not for every mail. So I’m wondering why I have such a big time difference. The postfix version is 3.3.1 (Centos 8). Many greetings, Stephan -- |If your life was a horse, you'd have to shoot it.|

Sending failure messages in separate mailbox

Hello! If a user sends a mail and postfix can’t deliver it (user unknown, mailbox quota, etc.), this user gets the error message. Is it possible to configure postfix in such a way, that these error messages are going to a different mailbox? Many greetings, Stephan -- |If your

Re: Enable IPv6 support in main.cf by default

will fail. Of course Postfix will try again with IPv4, and this will work, but it is an needlessfailure. Many greetings, Stephan -- |If your life was a horse, you'd have to shoot it.|

Re: The historical roots of our computer terms

On Mo, Jun 08, 2020 at 07:52:34 +0200, Claus R. Wickinghoff wrote: What about redlist (stop) and greenlist (go)? Traffic lights are pretty international. They aren’t. As far as I know you have a blue light for go in Japan. Stephan -- |If your life was a horse, you'd have to

Re: The historical roots of our computer terms

thrillers or horror movies happen in darkness and black environments. Daemons and devils are shown in dark colours as well. Stephan -- |If your life was a horse, you'd have to shoot it.|

Re: are rsa certs/keys still needed/recommended for use in postfix? or can just ecc be relied on?

mail reports via submission and STARTTLS, it will break without RSA keys/certs on the postfix server. Shade and sweet water! Stephan -- |If your life was a horse, you'd have to shoot it.|

Re: Postfix with two certifikates and DANE

On Fr, Jan 31, 2020 at 07:13:40 -0500, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: Would be nice if someone could help me. I think I'm someone... Thanks for your help. I have something to read now. Stephan -- |If your life was a horse, you'd have to shoot it.|

Postfix with two certifikates and DANE

encrypt Or the „Digital Signature Trust” CA? Would be nice if someone could help me. Many greetings, Stephan -- |If your life was a horse, you'd have to shoot it.|

Re: Problems with header checks

remove ML information from the subject as well. Shade and sweet water! Stephan -- |If your life was a horse, you'd have to shoot it.|

Re: Problems with header checks

I don’t know how to handle subjects like =?UTF-8?Q?Aw=3A_Weinprobe_gut_=C3=BCberstanden=3F?= Shade and sweet water! Stephan -- |If your life was a horse, you'd have to shoot it.|

Re: Problems with header checks

ut the warning about breaking DKIM signatures if I change the subject line is of course a valid one. Shade and sweet water! Stephan -- |If your life was a horse, you'd have to shoot it.|

Re: Problems with header checks

On Fr, Nov 08, 2019 at 01:44:53 +0100, Stephan Seitz wrote: Has anyone an idea how I can debug this further? Or why it is only sometimes working? I think I’ve found the problem. It happens if the subject has non-ASCII characters to the line looks like: =?UTF-8?Q?Aw=3A_Weinprobe_gut_=C3

Problems with header checks

water! Stephan -- |If your life was a horse, you'd have to shoot it.|

Re: RFC 5321 address quoting for policy delegation protocol

Hi Wietse, Op 06/11/2018 om 00:36 schreef Wietse Venema: Stephan Bosch: Hi, Is there a reason why Postfix omits quoting the localpart (when that would normally be necessary according to RFC 5321) of sender and recipient addresses passed to a policy delegation service (in this case Dovecot

RFC 5321 address quoting for policy delegation protocol

when communicating with a policy delegation service (i.e. check_policy_service acl) and I wonder whether it is a bug or whether there might be some reason. As shown, the addresses were quoted correctly in the original SMTP session, but Postfix drops the quotes and passes the result to the policy service. Regards, Stephan.

Re: SMTP Authentication without Encryption

m have you your certificate? Thanks! Stephan

Re: SMTP Authentication without Encryption

Hi! Yes, the ISP supports auth without SSL/TLS, but how can I configure postfix to use it? - I mean in all settings I can find, auth is always linked to SASL SSL/TLS. Cheers Stephan Am 12.07.2017 um 15:53 schrieb Gilberto Nunes: Hi AFAIK your isp must support auth methods other than SSL

SMTP Authentication without Encryption

authentification without encryption. Thanks & best regards, Stephan

“From:” address is ignored despite sender_login_maps

- 1 anvil scache unix - - n - 1 scache submission-header-cleanup unix n - n - 0 cleanup -o header_checks=regexp:/etc/postfix/submission_header_cleanup -- Best, Stephan

Re: Supporting SSLv3 in Postfix 3.1.0

SSLv3. If you really need it, you would have to compile your own openssl package. Many greetings, Stephan -- | Public Keys: http://fsing.rootsland.net/~stse/keys.html | smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: mysql lookup table and utf8

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 06:49:08AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: FYI, Postfix uses libmysqlclient. So what's up with not reading the default config file? Can it be the usual chroot problem? Stephan -- | Stephan Seitz E-Mail: s...@fsing.rootsland.net | | Public Keys:

Re: combine permit_sasl_authenticated with check_sender_access

L usernames and MAIL FROM addresses. However, I fail in seeing how this can fix my task: One of my local recipient addresses should only receive email from specific SASL usernames. So it's rather a "SASL username -> RCPT TO" ownership I am searching for. Maybe the above can be used to do that but I fail to see how. Any further pointers in the right directions are welcomed! Cheers, Stephan

combine permit_sasl_authenticated with check_sender_access

I've now played for hours without any luck. Any pointers in the right direction are really welcomed. Whenever I add another restriction class, it seems the first rule wins... Thanks, Stephan