Re: spy problem

2012-02-01 Thread Simone Ruffilli
Il 01/02/2012 10:33, Baptiste Bauer ha scritto: I suppose my workmate spy my mail sending ! ( i don't know how ! ) http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_REWRITING_README.html#auto_bcc This could be an option.

Re: do main.cf changes need a postfix reload?

2012-01-24 Thread Simone Ruffilli
Il 24/01/2012 11:40, Nick Warr ha scritto: However, if I change the $myhostname value with vi, postfix will respond with that changed value immediately without the reload.. Smtp processes are short lived; every time a new process is spawned, it uses the current configuration.

Undeliverable local mail: how do I change postfix behaviour to bounce message?

2012-01-18 Thread Simone Ruffilli
Is there a way to disable address checking (both local user existance and RFC compliance) before accepting an outgoing email? Whenever I try to send a mail that includes a non-existant local user in the recipient list the server immediatly complain a 5.1.1. I'd like to change that behaviour m

Re: Postfix very slow accepting a mail having a massive recipient list

2012-01-18 Thread Simone Ruffilli
Il 18/01/2012 11:22, Ralf Hildebrandt ha scritto: * Simone Ruffilli: Each recipient has to be checked against virtual_mailbox_domains and virtual_alias_maps (you don't have virtual_alias_domains set?), since the recipient COULD be one of your own recipients. make sure those queries are

Re: Postfix very slow accepting a mail having a massive recipient list

2012-01-18 Thread Simone Ruffilli
Il 18/01/2012 10:35, Ralf Hildebrandt ha scritto: * Simone Ruffilli: > whenever I submit to my postfix server a mail having a massive (~15k) > recipient list, it takes forever to accept and start delivering it. How do you submit the mail? Got some logs? No logs actually (I'

Postfix very slow accepting a mail having a massive recipient list

2012-01-18 Thread Simone Ruffilli
Hello everyone, whenever I submit to my postfix server a mail having a massive (~15k) recipient list, it takes forever to accept and start delivering it. I've done everything in the checklist (namely DNS caching), but it seems like the problem is not related to a DNS issue: tcpdump-ing port 5