orib...@gmail.com (Ori Bani) writes:
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > [An on-line version of this announcement will be available at
> > http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-2.9.0.html]
> >
> > Postfix stable release 2.9.0 is available. The main changes in no
> >
clunk.wercl...@wibblywobblyteapot.co.uk (Clunk Werclick) writes:
> > >> >>> It seems lots of lookups per message and I'm not sure that mysql
> > >> >>> will not crash like this
> >
> > Who's to say what "a lot" of lookups are? Why do you think mysql will
> > Just Crash? You're far better off loo
sjm...@pobox.com (Simon J Mudd) writes:
> For those interested I've updated the packages and you should be able
> to find:
> postfix-2.6.0-1.src.rpm and
> postfix-2.6.0-1.rhel5.x86_64.rpm
Updated to 2.6.1 as I hadn't seen Wietse's 2.6.1 update.
Simon
sjm...@pobox.com (Simon J Mudd) writes:
> I'll see if I can make some time to build some 2.6 rpms, but am likely
> to respond more if there are people who show an interest in these
> rpms I build.
For those interested I've updated the packages and you should be able
to fi
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com (Victor Duchovni) writes:
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 08:38:54PM +0200, Simon J Mudd wrote:
>
> > Others ask why not build from source. The simplicity of a single upgrade
> > procedure and reproducibility make this more favourable the more box
lis...@newnanutilities.org ("Brian Collins") writes:
> > I noticed that Postfix V#2.6.0 is now out. Does anybody know where to
> > get RPM files? GOOGLE did not help.
>
> Simon Mudd picks up the releases and makes good source and binary RPMs from
> them with lots of options. However, he's a busy
a.j.cai...@halplant.com ("Andrew J. Caines") writes:
> Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Making trouble reports easier requires a saslfinger-like tool that
> > captures info about Postfix, the OS, build options, etc.
>
> While not updated in a few years, postfinger[1] does a fair job of this.
>
>
> [1]
