Re: Rejecting Spam Based on Spamassassin Score

n that case. Sean -- Sean Reifschneider, Member of Technical Staff tummy.com, ltd. - Linux Consulting since 1995: Ask me about High Availability signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Mail server responded 5.7.1

and why. This is often in /var/log/maillog or /var/log/mail.log on Linux systems. Sean -- Sean Reifschneider, Member of Technical Staff tummy.com, ltd. - Linux Consulting since 1995: Ask me about High Availability signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RBL Usage questions

influence the score. So if one RBL says something bad, it doesn't influence it as much as if many of them do. Sean -- Sean Reifschneider, Member of Technical Staff tummy.com, ltd. - Linux Consulting since 1995: Ask me about High Availability signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: ot: spf bounce on forwarded email

m your host. Otherwise you're going to have to implement SRS. Sean -- Sean Reifschneider, Member of Technical Staff tummy.com, ltd. - Linux Consulting since 1995: Ask me about High Availability signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Relaying and backskatter problem

see if that server will accept it. There's probably a better way to do it, but that's what comes to my mind. Sean -- Sean Reifschneider, Member of Technical Staff tummy.com, ltd. - Linux Consulting since 1995: Ask me about High Availability signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Milter SMFIC_HEADER failure (huh, due to success? :-)

problem. I'm fairly familiar with Stephen's problem, his milter is based on the milter code that we're using, he's a good friend of mine and I'm the one that suggested he use a milter to do what he wanted, and helped him get started with it. But, we'll give it a

Re: Milter SMFIC_HEADER failure (huh, due to success? :-)

ing to work on information to allow us to reproduce it, so far only the customers involved can reproduce it. So, I'd say don't spend too much time on trying to reproduce it -- that's our job. :-) We were just hoping there was something obvious in the configuration or simila

Re: Milter SMFIC_HEADER failure (huh, due to success? :-)

FYI: Using protocol version 3 is also causing the same errors to be logged. So we've tried 2, 3, 4, and 6. Thanks, Sean -- Sean Reifschneider, Member of Technical Staff tummy.com, ltd. - Linux Consulting since 1995: Ask me about High Availability signature.asc Description: OpenPGP di

Re: Milter SMFIC_HEADER failure (huh, due to success? :-)

rong protocol version causes problems on all the milter interactions. In this case the milter is working fine for almost all the requests, except for a couple of users (out of thousands). Thanks, Sean -- Sean Reifschneider, Member of Technical Staff tummy.com, ltd. - Linux Consulting since 19

Milter SMFIC_HEADER failure (huh, due to success? :-)

, if that helps. So we do want this milter running on the submission port -- it is a NOOP for recipients that are non-local. Any thoughts on this? Thanks, Sean -- Sean Reifschneider, Member of Technical Staff tummy.com, ltd. - Linux Consulting since 1995: Ask me about High Availability signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature