, at 11:29 PM, Ron Scott-Adams wrote:
> Wietse,
>
> Thank you for the reply. However, I didn’t have any entry for “ron” in the
> maps previously. I think it’s as Matthijs indicated, and something is going
> on in the Dovecot side. I clearly need to re-read docs I haven’t visited i
. I’ll keep plugging away.
Thanks for the help, everyone.
On Feb 26, 2014, at 6:51 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Ron Scott-Adams:
>> Telnet sessions in which I use RCPT TO:r...@joab.tohuw.net fail
>> with "550 5.1.1 : Recipient address rejected:
>> User unknown in local rec
!
On Feb 26, 2014, at 3:40 AM, l...@grootstyr.eu wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 01:44:07AM -0500, Ron Scott-Adams wrote:
>>
>> I?ve updated a working user on this test server from r...@tohuw.net to
>> r...@joab.tohuw.net. Under the previous address, I could successfully
I’ve updated a working user on this test server from r...@tohuw.net to
r...@joab.tohuw.net. Under the previous address, I could successfully complete
a telnet session and convey mail for r...@tohuw.net to the local MTA.
After changing the user’s mail attribute in LDAP to r...@joab.tohuw.net and
Not at all. asgljgsglhg.aergohgergearguaoreg.gaegergheagaerhgaerhgopaeg is just
as much an FQDN as mail.google.com.
Ron Scott-Adams
r...@tohuw.net
"Soap and education are not as sudden as a massacre, but they are more deadly
in the long run." (Mark Twain)
On Jun 7, 2013
IMHO, preventing emails with differing from and sender values is contradictory
to valid usage of email. You are better off rate-limiting, as was already
suggested, and employing better mail content analysis through policy servers.
Ron Scott-Adams
r...@tohuw.net
"We are stuck with techn
