Re: What became of nullmx? (draft-delany-nullmx-00)

orried about MTA's asking root servers for MX records. -- r...@polylogics.com "The avalanche has already started, it is too Rod Dorman late for the pebbles to vote." - Ambassador Kosh

Re: 421 service not available (connection refused, too many connections): ALL servers

On Monday, March 5, 2012, 12:06:09, Wietse Venema wrote: > Rod Dorman: >> On Monday, March 5, 2012, 09:53:31, /dev/rob0 wrote: >> > ... >> > Another WAG: maybe your ISP's upstream provider got tired of >> > complaints and implemented this redirection upstr

Re: 421 service not available (connection refused, too many connections): ALL servers

e cause. Without deep packet inspection there would be no way to distinguish between SMTP packets originating from the ISP's MTA vs. his MTA. -- r...@polylogics.com "The avalanche has already started, it is too Rod Dorman late for the pebbles to vote." - Ambassador Kosh

Re: Disable sending mails via telnet

ogics.com "The avalanche has already started, it is too Rod Dorman late for the pebbles to vote." - Ambassador Kosh

Re: Disable sending mails via telnet

On Tuesday, January 10, 2012, 16:45:25, Leslie León Sinclair wrote: > Can anyone point me in the right direction, I´m stucked here and Google > is not helping... TELNET the Protocol or a telnet client? -- r...@polylogics.com "The avalanche has already started, it is too

Re: reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname RFC basis?

h. For every IP address, there should be a matching PTR record in the in-addr.arpa domain. -- r...@polylogics.com "The avalanche has already started, it is too Rod Dorman late for the pebbles to vote." - Ambassador Kosh

Re: smtp-sink shows one more empty EHLO option

his aspect of RFC 821, then that > is unfortunate. I really can't revalidate every line of Postfix > source code whenever a new RFC comes out. Nope, RFC 2821 and RFC 5321 still has the same text. It even goes on to say As noted above, servers SHOULD send the if subsequent text is

Re: Character by character SMTP banner?

it a postfix feature that causes this behaviour? It sounds like the behaviour of OpenBSD's spam deferral daemon http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=spamd&sektion=8 -- r...@polylogics.com "The avalanche has already started, it is too Rod Dorman late for

Re: Accepting email regardless of address

dyguards that > stereotypically guard a club from unwanted guests. ;) Do you know what 'xyz.com' will be doing with mail you send to them where the address isn't valid on their system? -- r...@polylogics.com "The avalanche has already started, it is too Rod Dorman late for the pebbles to vote." - Ambassador Kosh

Re: Accepting email regardless of address

estion is what will xyz.com do if it doesn't like it? Bouncing it is not an option. -- r...@polylogics.com "The avalanche has already started, it is too Rod Dorman late for the pebbles to vote." - Ambassador Kosh

Re: Clarification between smtpd_sender_restrictions & smtpd_recipient_restrictions

ions that the Postfix SMTP server applies in the context of the RCPT TO command." -- r...@polylogics.com "The avalanche has already started, it is too Rod Dorman late for the pebbles to vote." - Ambassador Kosh

Re: How to manage 2 banners/greetings through postscreen, content filter, and after-filter SMTP on 1 server?

mail. If you only have one physical box you've severely limited that concept. -- r...@polylogics.com "The avalanche has already started, it is too Rod Dorman late for the pebbles to vote." - Ambassador Kosh

sorbs.net issues

valanche has already started, it is too Rod Dorman late for the pebbles to vote." - Ambassador Kosh

Re: OT: ISP Blocking of port 25

egal. Have we gone far enough off the topic of Postfix yet for this thread to be declared dead? -- r...@polylogics.com "The avalanche has already started, it is too Rod Dorman late for the pebbles to vote." - Ambassador Kosh

Re: additional parameters to the SMTP MAIL and RCPT commands

On Friday, July 9, 2010, 18:57:10, Rod Dorman wrote: > On Friday, July 9, 2010, 17:42:37, Sufian Hameed wrote: >> does Postfix Supports additional parameters to the SMTP MAIL and RCPT >> commands as mentioned in RFC 2821 and others? >> >> RCPT TO: [ SP ] >>

Re: additional parameters to the SMTP MAIL and RCPT commands

r...@polylogics.com "The avalanche has already started, it is too Rod Dorman late for the pebbles to vote." - Ambassador Kosh

Re: smtpd_reject_unlisted_recipient

hat > people can't probe for valid users to know wherer to start a brute force. So when a spammer uses my e-mail address you'll send the bounce to me? Gee, thanks. -- r...@polylogics.com "The avalanche has already started, it is too Rod Dorman late for the pebbles to vote." - Ambassador Kosh

Re: postscreen test

quot;bounce unix" service, will having: > > smtp inet n - n - 1 bouncer > ... > bounceunix - - n - 0 bounce > > cause significant confusion? Naming it "bouncer" might reduce the confusion a

Re: temporary errors for DNS

On Monday, July 13, 2009, 17:49:10, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote: > ... > Are there distros that are known to have a postfix package that is set > up correctly wrt chroot? OpenBSD -- r...@polylogics.com "The avalanche has already started, it is too Rod Dorman

Re: [ANN] iRedMail-0.3: Open Source Mail Server Solution

. That's an odd porting philosophy. The conventional practice is to feed your diffs back to the original developers so ideally it will become multi-platform. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] "The avalanche has already started, it is too Rod Dorman late for the pebbles to vote." - Ambassador Kosh

Re: cannot find your hostname

TECTED] "The avalanche has already started, it is too Rod Dorman late for the pebbles to vote." - Ambassador Kosh