On 03/03/17 20:22, Bill Cole wrote:
On 1 Mar 2017, at 17:00, Robert Sharp wrote:
I was prompted from reading a recent post to check whether my
postscreen set up was picking up Spamhaus responses. Quick grep
through my logs confirmed that it was not. Seems I am in a bit of
Bind (sorry for the
I was prompted from reading a recent post to check whether my postscreen
set up was picking up Spamhaus responses. Quick grep through my logs
confirmed that it was not. Seems I am in a bit of Bind (sorry for the
pun). If I use Google's DNS I dont get a response from zen.spamhaus.org.
If I use m
On 29/09/15 21:47, coolhandluke wrote:
On 2015-09-29 05:13, Robert Sharp wrote:
I have been trying to use a third-party backup provider to cover
occasional outages (SiXwishlist). I set up an MX record as instructed
but I get no emails sent on when my server recovers. I asked them to
check
Hi,
I have had a few problems recently with my router/server locking up and
I was thinking about reducing the load on it by moving as much as
possible to another machine and making the server more reliable. I know
I could just DNAT port 25 to another machine, but that creates two
points of fa
il systems. I use 587
internally for submission so I don't see why I would make it accessible
to the outside world. Do I need to open another port? Have I got port 25
wrong all this time? Or do I need to get myself a proper backup provider?
Thanks,
Robert Sharp
to change postfix at the same
time in case hardening all went wrong - but perhaps it is worth
configuring if only to stop my logs filling with Lost Connection reports?
Thanks in anticipation of any helpful comments,
Robert Sharp
Hi
I have postfix set up with smtpd processes on three ports: 25 for the
wild world out there, 587 for submission from local users and other MTAs
on the LAN, and 10025 for re-injection from amavis. I am doing some log
analysis and I think it would be really, really helpful if smtpd could
log
