Jan P. Kessler wrote, On 7/1/2009 12:34 PM:
Bingo:
-o
receive_override_options=no_header_body_checks,no_unknown_recipient_checks
Any negative consequences for eliminating this line, or changing it to:
-o receive_override_options=no_unknown_recipient_checks
header_checks will be executed t
Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote, On 7/1/2009 10:40 AM:
Do you have anything like:
"receive_override_options=no_header_body_checks" in master.cf for the
content_filter reinjection?
This will not match if so.
Bingo:
-o
receive_override_options=no_header_body_checks,no_unknown_recipient_che
Rob Brandt wrote, On 7/1/2009 9:09 AM:
Excellent, I now get a match using postmap. If the spam doesn't cease,
I'll be back. Thanks everyone!
Rob
Nuts. I am still getting spam. Is there any reason header_checks might
not be enabled? Is header_checks being run before SA
Magnus Bäck wrote, On 6/30/2009 11:39 PM:
On Wed, July 1, 2009 8:13 am, Rob Brandt said:
Could I get an example of how to use postmap -q? I have tried:
postmap -q "X-Spam-Flag: YES" /etc/postfix/header_checks
where "X-Spam-Flag: YES" is the header I am trying to ch
Magnus Bäck wrote:
On Wednesday, July 01, 2009 at 07:02 CEST,
Rob Brandt wrote:
Sahil Tandon wrote:
I prefer pcre:, but the following patterns should work with regexp:
as well.
No, {n} isn't supported by regexp.
/^Subject:.*\*{3}SPAM\*{3}/ DISCARD ***SPAM***
/^X-Spam-Flag
out. Is
here a log somewhere where I can see what's going on?
Rob
Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Rob Brandt wrote:
I'm trying to set up a basic header check to get rid of emails sa marks
as spam. I've added the following link to main.cf:
header_checks = regexp:/etc/p
I'm trying to set up a basic header check to get rid of emails sa marks
as spam. I've added the following link to main.cf:
header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/filter
/etc/postfix/filter has:
# No ***SPAM***
/^Subject .*\*\*\*SPAM\*\*\*/ DISCARD ***SPAM***
# SPam flag
/^X-Spam-Flag .YES/
