On 9 juin 2010, at 23:42, Noel Jones wrote:
> For problems with amavisd-new, better to ask on the amavis-users list.
I know that, but I've already googled for a fix on Amavisd's side, with no
luck. The only bug report I've found is on Debian's site, claiming that Postfix
should not accept the m
On 9 juin 2010, at 17:31, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> It's ok for my all my clients but one. It's an appliance, so I
>> cannot change anything about its way to handle SMTP protocol.
>
> Besides making this configurable for Amavisd-new, the other
> option is to use the Postfix 2.7 smtpd_command_filter
Hello,
I used to have a old SMTP server, with after-queue content filtering. My new
setup involve a before-queue content filter (amavisd). Unfortunately, Amavisd
is a little bit strict about the smtp session: it bounces email sent using
"MAIL FROM: address" instead of "MAIL FROM:".
It's ok for
On 4 juin 2010, at 15:03, Wietse Venema wrote:
> I suppose you missed the Postfix RELEASE_NOTES files. I spend a
> great deal of time maintaining this document, in the hope that it
> will save system adminstrators time.
You're absolutely right. I always read the release notes before an upgrade,
Hi Victor,
On 2 juin 2010, at 18:49, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 05:14:45PM +0200, Proniewski Patrick wrote:
>
>> So it appears that the connection between MAILGW and LB is not always
>> properly closed. Am I wrong?
>
> http://www.pos
Wietse,
Thank you for your fast reply.
On 2 juin 2010, at 17:28, Wietse Venema wrote:
> If Postfix does not accept connections, then it will log warnings.
No warning on postfix side, otherwise I would have posted a sample here of
course.
This is a big jump between 2.0.10 and 2.7. I was not af
Hello,
I've switched few days ago from an old Mac OS X Server 10.3.x / Postfix 2.0.10
to a FreeBSD 7.3 / Postfix 2.7.0.
Since then, I've got various problems. This message will present only one of
them.
Here is my setup:
A postfix mail gateway (MAILGW) doing address rewriting gets emails from
