> On Jun 20, 2024, at 7:17 AM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> Paul Schmehl via Postfix-users:
>> Is there a place in postfix where I could discard mail if it has
>> a spam score higher than say 4 or 5? I know that postfix hands the
>> mail off to s
for processing and then receives it back for delivery, but I’m unclear what
checks could be implemented to catch spam and discard it.
This is what I could match on: X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=2.1
If the score was higher than some number (e.g >4) than reject the mail.
Paul Schmehl
paul.schm...
> On Jun 18, 2024, at 3:33 PM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> Paul Schmehl via Postfix-users:
>> [18-Jun-2024 14:53:32 -0500]: PHP Error: SMTP server does not
>> support authentication (POST
>> /webmail/?_task=mail&_unlock=loading17
> On Jun 18, 2024, at 2:45 PM, Noel Jones via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
>
>> On Jun 18, 2024, at 2:30 PM, Paul Schmehl via Postfix-users
>> wrote:
>>
>> So, here is what I now have configued in roundcube:
>>
>> $config['smt
> On Jun 18, 2024, at 2:45 PM, Noel Jones via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
>
>> On Jun 18, 2024, at 2:30 PM, Paul Schmehl via Postfix-users
>> wrote:
>>
>> So, here is what I now have configued in roundcube:
>>
>> $config['smt
but not directly from the server. Meanwhile, our forum
software (UBBThreads) is having no problems at all sending mail to the same
server.
Paul Schmehl
paul.schm...@gmail.com
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
> On Jun 18, 2024, at 1:34 AM, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 01:04:25AM -0500, Paul Schmehl via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
>> # posttls-finger -w -lsecure -C "mail.stovebolt.com:465" "www.stovebolt.com"
>
> On Jun 18, 2024, at 12:38 AM, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 11:39:27PM -0500, Paul Schmehl via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
>> That might have uncovered a problem.
>>
>> # posttls-finger -w -lsecure -C "
> On Jun 17, 2024, at 10:14 PM, Cowbay via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> On 2024/6/18 10:43, Paul Schmehl via Postfix-users wrote:
> The problem is neither tls nor ssl worked. No matter what config I used,
> roundcube would always through an error. If I used $config[
> On Jun 17, 2024, at 6:30 PM, Peter via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
>> On 17/06/2024 17:28, Paul Schmehl wrote:
>>> How do you set up roundcube to not use authentication? I really don’t need
>>> it since it’s on the same machine as the mail server. What con
> On Jun 17, 2024, at 4:27 PM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> Paul Schmehl via Postfix-users:
>>>>> - Did the client send starttls? That is logged in the "disconnect
>>>>> from" line.
>>>>>
>>
> On Jun 17, 2024, at 7:12 AM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> Paul Schmehl via Postfix-users:
>>> On Jun 16, 2024, at 5:02?PM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Paul Schmehl via Postfix-users:
>>>> I?m
> On Jun 17, 2024, at 4:43 AM, Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> Dnia 16.06.2024 o godz. 20:54:34 Paul Schmehl via Postfix-users pisze:
>>
>> The odd thing is, I don’t see any connection attempts at all in the mail
>> logs.
>
> May seem a str
> On Jun 17, 2024, at 12:16 AM, Peter via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> On 17/06/24 16:49, Paul Schmehl via Postfix-users wrote:
>> On Jun 16, 2024, at 10:30 PM, Peter via Postfix-users
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> It's likely that r
the problem. I have roundcube sending mail on port 25
with no auth (all daemons are running on the same server), and it is sending
mail. Gmail rejects it, but I’ve altered my spf record to include localhost. I
hope once that propagates my problems with be solved.
Paul Schmehl
pa
have
missed something in the config. I’m wondering if roundcube is not even attempt
auth because postfix isn’t announcing it as a service that it offers.
Paul Schmehl
paul.schm...@gmail.com
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To
> On Jun 16, 2024, at 5:02 PM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> Paul Schmehl via Postfix-users:
>> I?m trying to sort out a problem with Roundcube failing to send email with
>> an error message that says SMTP Error(): authentication failed. In the
>&
ich I
entered, and then for a password, which I entered. I was then able to type
commands as expected.
I also tested using an incorrect password, and the login was rejected. So, it
appears to me that postfix is working correctly
Paul Schmehl
paul.schm...@gmail.com
___
See inline comments.
Paul Schmehl
paul.schm...@gmail.com
> On Jun 13, 2024, at 3:12 PM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> Paul Schmehl via Postfix-users:
>> I'm 77. I've been retired for 10 years. Now I'm struggling trying
>> to get postfix
delete. Since I copied my
2.10 setup to 3.9, I’m sure there’s some detritus in there that needs to be
culled.
Paul Schmehl
paul.schm...@gmail.com
> On Jun 13, 2024, at 12:21 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
>
> I’m 77. I’ve been retired for 10 years. Now I’m struggling trying to get
> pos
le. I’m far from a pro, and I’ve been out of the game for a
decade.
Paul Schmehl
paul.schm...@gmail.com
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
--On December 15, 2018 at 9:36:56 PM -0500 Bill Cole
wrote:
On 15 Dec 2018, at 14:00, Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On December 14, 2018 at 4:09:08 PM -0500 Bill Cole
wrote:
On 14 Dec 2018, at 15:32, Bill Cole wrote:
On 14 Dec 2018, at 0:46, Paul Schmehl wrote:
I'm seeing this error i
Thanks, Bill. I'll do that right away.
Paul Schmehl
Independent Researcher
--On December 14, 2018 at 4:09:08 PM -0500 Bill Cole
wrote:
On 14 Dec 2018, at 15:32, Bill Cole wrote:
On 14 Dec 2018, at 0:46, Paul Schmehl wrote:
I'm seeing this error in the logs:
warn: Unescaped left brace in regex is deprecated here (and will be
fata))
NOTE: that message s
--On December 14, 2018 at 4:09:08 PM -0500 Bill Cole
wrote:
On 14 Dec 2018, at 15:32, Bill Cole wrote:
On 14 Dec 2018, at 0:46, Paul Schmehl wrote:
I'm seeing this error in the logs:
warn: Unescaped left brace in regex is deprecated here (and will be
fata))
NOTE: that message s
--On December 14, 2018 at 2:49:36 PM -0700 "@lbutlr"
wrote:
On 13 Dec 2018, at 20:05, Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On December 13, 2018 at 9:00:06 PM +0100 Benny Pedersen
wrote:
Paul Schmehl skrev den 2018-12-13 20:45:
The user does not exist until "ls -l" is able to co
--On December 14, 2018 at 3:32:11 PM -0500 Bill Cole
wrote:
On 14 Dec 2018, at 0:46, Paul Schmehl wrote:
I'm seeing this error in the logs:
warn: Unescaped left brace in regex is deprecated here (and will be
fata))
It would be a wise choice to update ALL of your Perl modules t
--On December 14, 2018 at 3:32:11 PM -0500 Bill Cole
wrote:
On 14 Dec 2018, at 0:46, Paul Schmehl wrote:
I'm seeing this error in the logs:
warn: Unescaped left brace in regex is deprecated here (and will be
fata))
This is a new warning in Perl 5.26. The use of curly-brace
code problem in spam assassin (which I
assume they will fix at some point)?
Googling says it's a perl error, so it can't be the filter shell script.
Paul Schmehl
Independent Researcher
--On December 13, 2018 at 9:00:06 PM +0100 Benny Pedersen
wrote:
Paul Schmehl skrev den 2018-12-13 20:45:
The user does not exist until "ls -l" is able to correctly identify
the
files as belonging to the user.
Hmmm...thank you, Victor. I'll try to sort that out.
if
--On December 13, 2018 at 2:36:44 PM -0500 Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
On Dec 13, 2018, at 2:33 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
# ls -lsa /home/filter/.spamassassin/
total 25056
2 drwx-- 2 1004 filter 512 Dec 10 21:45 .
why is 1004 when it should be ascii usernamme ?
what user is 1004
--On December 13, 2018 at 6:54:48 PM +0100 Benny Pedersen
wrote:
Paul Schmehl skrev den 2018-12-13 18:36:
# ls -lsa /home/filter/.spamassassin/
total 25056
2 drwx-- 2 1004 filter 512 Dec 10 21:45 .
why is 1004 when it should be ascii usernamme ?
what user is 1004 ?, its
Dec 10 21:45 bayes_toks
0 -rw-r--r-- 1 1004 filter 0 Dec 26 2012 user_prefs
I'm at a loss. It's probably something obvious, but I don't see it.
Paul Schmehl
Independent Researcher
gr[347]: BBA8F3F9F1CA: removed
This message was rejected.
"The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who
reads them, inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer the truth than he
whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors." - Thomas Jefferson
Paul Schmehl (
--On October 22, 2016 at 1:51:12 PM -0400 Bill Cole
wrote:
On 22 Oct 2016, at 12:19, Paul Schmehl wrote:
I would make one suggestion. I would reject the attempt silently. No
sense in tipping off the spammer to what he needs to do to work around
it. Just use REJECT with no explanation
--On October 22, 2016 at 11:27:56 AM -0500 "/dev/rob0"
wrote:
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 11:19:36AM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On October 22, 2016 at 12:16:33 PM +0200 Paul van der Vlis
wrote:
> Op 22-10-16 om 04:32 schreef Bill Cole:
>>/127\.0\.0\.1/REJECT you ar
anation.
"The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who
reads them, inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer the truth than he
whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors." - Thomas Jefferson
Paul Schmehl (pschm...@tx.rr.com)
Independent Researcher
he man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who
reads them, inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer the truth than he
whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors." - Thomas Jefferson
Paul Schmehl (pschm...@tx.rr.com)
Independent Researcher
SASSIN -x > out.$$ || \
{ echo Cannot save mail to file; exit $EX_TEMPFAIL; }
if egrep -q "^X-Spam-Level: \*{$SPAMLIMIT,}" < out.$$
then
mv out.$$ $SPAMDIR
elif egrep -q "^X-Spam-Level: \*{$SPAMCK,}" < out.$$
then
$SENDMAIL geek < out.$$
else
$SENDMAIL "$@&
--On August 20, 2015 at 3:36:45 AM + Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 10:21:54PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> This is not the right test. Try:
>
>$ getent passwd filter
That returns nothing. It does return the line for my account. So what
would be the caus
--On August 20, 2015 at 1:51:11 AM + Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 06:11:09PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
After I got the server working properly again, I began sifting through
logs trying to see if there were any clues. I found this in the
messages log: /var/log
--On August 19, 2015 at 5:47:44 PM + Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 12:30:55PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
When it is broken, you need to fix it, not comment it out, *and*
when commenting out multi-line entries in master.cf, you have to
comment out *each* line, not just
--On August 19, 2015 at 7:10:00 PM + Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 01:38:34PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
I do this once in a blue moon, so troubleshooting problems requires me to
dive back into man pages and try to understand what's going on. The
error that I thi
n - 0 tlsproxy
There's obviously something wrong in here, but what is is escapes me. I
need help.
Paul Schmehl (pschm...@tx.rr.com)
Independent Researcher
--On August 19, 2015 at 5:16:03 PM + Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 11:42:36AM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
Well, with the complete log entry (provided in *this* message), we
see that the "filter" transport is the one that's missing.
>># ca
--On August 19, 2015 at 4:21:52 PM + Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 10:49:35AM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
After reinstalling, I had problems with policyd-weight. I was seeing
these errors in the logs:
postfix/policyd-weight[17306]: warning: child: err: Undefined
/postfix/aliases
/usr/local/etc/postfix/canonical /usr/local/etc/postfix/relocated
/usr/local/etc/postfix/transport /usr/local/etc/postfix/virtual
--On August 19, 2015 at 10:49:35 AM -0500 Paul Schmehl
wrote:
I'm struggling with a broken Postfix and can't figure out what's wro
unix - - n - 0 dnsblog
tlsproxy unix - - n - 0 tlsproxy
I am lost and frustrated. I went from a working install to a broken
install. Any help spotting problems would be appreciated.
Paul Schmehl (pschm...@tx.rr.com)
Independent Researcher
om SpamAssassin stating 127.0.0.0/32 is already
included as an internal network. Therefore, the OP should remove the
internal network configuration option from the SpamAssassin config.
Thanks. That solved the problem.
--
Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst
As if it wasn't already obvious
re sending it to see if that resolves the issue.
--
Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst
As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions
are my own and not those of my employer.
***
"It is as useless to argue with those who have
renounced the us
database
/usr/local/mailman/data/aliases.db is older than source file
/usr/local/mailman/data/aliases
Jan 9 04:05:44 mail postfix/local[35259]: CBE712F157D:
to=, relay=local, delay=0.07, delays=0.04/0.01/0/0.02,
dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered to maildir)
Jan 9 04:05:44 mail postfix/qmgr[59
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Postfix-and-Portimail-Issues-tp51465
.html Sent from the Postfix Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Paul Schmehl (g...@stovebolt.com)
The Stovebolt Geek
The Net's Oldest and Most Complete
Resource for Antique Chevy and GM Trucks
http://www.stovebolt.com
to do.
--
Paul Schmehl (g...@stovebolt.com)
The Stovebolt Geek
The Net's Oldest and Most Complete
Resource for Antique Chevy and GM Trucks
http://www.stovebolt.com
op
$recipient
relay unix - - n - - smtp
smtp inet n - n - 1 postscreen
smtpd pass - - n - - smtpd
The problem is, I also want to route through filter.sh, so how do I do that?
--
Paul Schmehl (g..
t_reject_code = 550
virtual_alias_domains = friendshipforest.com fieldoftrees.com
txantimedia.com
virtual_alias_maps = hash:/usr/local/etc/postfix/virtual
--
Paul Schmehl (g...@stovebolt.com)
The Stovebolt Geek
The Net's Oldest and Most Complete
Resource for Antique Chevy and GM Trucks
http://www.stovebolt.com
55 matches
Mail list logo
