[pfx] Re: Forward mails if user unknown in local recipient table

2024-02-14 Thread Nikolai Lusan via Postfix-users
ne via existing VPN tunnels we had - some people mistook that as local storage with remote dovecot using NFS to access mail stores). - -- Nikolai Lusan Email: niko...@lusan.id.au -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEVfd4GW6z4nsBxdLo4ZaDR

[pfx] Re: What features to deprecate

2024-02-14 Thread Nikolai Lusan via Postfix-users
ml https://www.postfix.com/SMTPD_POLICY_README.html And if that's not enough just start reading the page with _all_ the configuration directive and figure out what you need 🙂 - -- Nikolai Lusan Email: niko...@lusan.id.au -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEVfd4G

[pfx] Re: Server etiquette

2024-02-14 Thread Nikolai Lusan via Postfix-users
that you don't end up in a bid like that frequently. > To my surprise they went away. The users? or the attacks? - in my mind either is a win 😉 - -- Nikolai Lusan Email: niko...@lusan.id.au -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEVfd4GW6z4nsBxdLo4ZaD

[pfx] Re: Server etiquette

2024-02-14 Thread Nikolai Lusan via Postfix-users
king.  With > > > firewall > > > rules there's not sufficient forensic evidence left behind. > > On 14.02.24 19:11, Nikolai Lusan via Postfix-users wrote: > > Here's a tip - try the 'LOG' target before you DROP/DENY/REJECT (I > > prefer REJECT

[pfx] Re: Server etiquette

2024-02-14 Thread Nikolai Lusan via Postfix-users
ou know are legit and block the domain (assuming there is more than one address sending spam/virus/garbage). Or you could go down the path most MS hosted domains do, and send everything to SPAM folders unless the address/domain is in someones contact list (probably means writing a filter that can co

[pfx] Re: Server etiquette

2024-02-14 Thread Nikolai Lusan via Postfix-users
REJECT with an ICMP host/port unreachable for _all_ ports on my side of the link). - -- Nikolai Lusan Email: niko...@lusan.id.au -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEVfd4GW6z4nsBxdLo4ZaDRV2VL6QFAmXMg98ACgkQ4ZaDRV2V L6TCmA/8DPfKVskn6Cq8k2Da0U/e2JIOgzJgiBdwmNbIyi1J+fJjw3BL2vqp0

Re: how to deal with t-online's blocking

2022-11-30 Thread Nikolai Lusan
ation. Another example of a problematic issue is a requirement by the Australian government for anyone working on products that use encryption to insert a backdoor that law enforcement can activate if requested - a requirement that after legislated saw many Au

Re: unexpected: postfix tls deploy-server-cert + smtpd_tls_chain_files

2022-03-31 Thread Nikolai Lusan
ew files - eventually by inspecting the relevant hash files I found copies of old certs in them ... hence rebuilding the hash files on update. - -- Nikolai Lusan -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEVfd4GW6z4nsBxdLo4ZaDRV2VL6QFAmJFv1kACgkQ4ZaDRV2V L6TrkRAAlSg1rsudX3ctj+/kYp0izWVG/xCXZNSD

Re: unexpected: postfix tls deploy-server-cert + smtpd_tls_chain_files

2022-03-29 Thread Nikolai Lusan
on in one file (in my case vmail_ssl.map) that file gets mapped with postmap. When new keys or certs get deployed I delete the vmail_ssl.map.db file, regenerate it with postmap, and then restart postfix. (I is worth noting that I host multiple domains and use SNI - so this solution

Re: Why the name Postfix?

2022-03-29 Thread Nikolai Lusan
tioned to Postfix. - -- Nikolai Lusan -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEVfd4GW6z4nsBxdLo4ZaDRV2VL6QFAmJC9vAACgkQ4ZaDRV2V L6QuZBAAj7WVOh5wA8ZWRX4FcrtJLR487ofUZX0/JTqOKe9AuRN+naCPlPcaPooG jH6BTQ1EuFptzPyEUb3T401yX2q9/6UOyPCFnGF8X2R00eXcAb9FVri4b3okotHq WIiEwWXsDlzSSJsJqEWSj87QMhbZ0

Re: Why the name Postfix?

2022-03-29 Thread Nikolai Lusan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Sun, 2022-03-27 at 09:08 +0530, Amarjeet Anand wrote: > What’s the story behind choosing the name as “Postfix”? As with all children it's what it's parents chose to call it 🙂 - -- Nikolai Lusan -BEGIN

Re: lower case email address for delivery

2020-11-29 Thread Nikolai Lusan
.tld[private/dovecot-lmtp], delay=0.16, > delays=0.08/0/0/0.08, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 > YIesL90lwl+2hAEA0J78UA Saved) > > How can I lowercase the complete email address in postfix before > delivery? It happens like this in my case: > > vir

Re: SMTP TLS delivery fallback

2020-08-19 Thread Nikolai Lusan
me I reviewed the cipherlist, but I have other things on my plate right now. - -- Nikolai Lusan Email: niko...@lusan.id.au Phone: 0425 661 620 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEVfd4GW6z4nsBxdLo4ZaDRV2VL6QFAl89RjwACgkQ4ZaDRV2V L6SeJg/9HuehYiuG2Ebg8N46og3sJkgtzcsghr1pq3BpiABIiI3m9V

Re: SNI problem

2020-06-12 Thread Nikolai Lusan
> The OP also has other excessive fine-tuning of the TLS stack that > is somewhat counter-productive. > > * 4096 bit RSA cert > * TLS 1.0 disabled > * Overly specific cipherlist > * ... > > For SMTP, try to h

SNI and Letsencrypt wildcards.

2020-02-06 Thread Nikolai Lusan
dom_exchange_name = /var/lib/postfix/prng_exch tls_random_prng_update_period = 3600s tls_random_reseed_period = 3600s tls_random_source = dev:/dev/urandom tls_server_sni_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/vmail_ssl.map Thanks - -- Nikolai Lusan Email: niko...@lusan.id.au Phone: 0425 661