On 16/01/13 22:20, Erwan David wrote:
Le 16/01/2013 23:17, Terry Gilsenan a écrit :
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of TFML
Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2013 7:55 AM
To: Postfix users
Subject: Recommendations for
On 13/12/12 06:26, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 12/12/2012 6:05 PM, Tony Nelson wrote:
I think it's in my best interest to get TLS operational again.
So, you encrypt the transmission from the internal corporate groupware
server to the gateway server via a private network that you completely
contro
On 24/08/12 02:33, li...@sbt.net.au wrote:
I'm just setting up a new Postix server with TLS on Centos 6, I've
generated self certified certificate, that all seems OK as follows:
smtpd_tls_cert_file = /etc/pki/tls/certs/server.crt
smtpd_tls_key_file = /etc/pki/tls/certs/server.key
but I'm 'missi
On 02/06/12 17:44, Sahil Tandon wrote:
I am seeing hundreds (on higher volume days, over a thousand) of lines
like:
Jun 2 10:04:30 mx1 postfix/dnsblog[58868]: warning: dnsblog_query:
lookup error for DNS query 23.124.167.115.b.barracudacentral.org: Host
or domain name not found. Name serv
On 22/10/11 22:36, Jack Fredrikson wrote:
Add the postfix user to the sasl group (this makes sure that Postfix has
the permission to access saslauthd):
[root@example jack]# ls -al /usr/sbin/saslauthd
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 83848 Mar 17 2010 /usr/sbin/saslauthd
[root@example jack]# ls -al /et
On 20/09/11 14:50, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 9/19/2011 6:31 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
I don't know of any up-to-date header/body checks repository. AFIK
the ones found on the internet are outdated enough to be ineffective
and just waste time.
These might be useful. Pick your own preferred action. S
On 02/05/11 17:21, Steve Jenkins wrote:
This isn't a Postfix issue, just an FYI for those running updated
versions of Postfix on CentOS.
I recently updated one of my CentOS 5.5 systems (which was running
Postfix 2.8.2 compiled from source) to CentOS 5.6. The Postfix package
appeared nowhere on t
On 03/03/11 06:44, kapetr wrote:
On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 19:11:53 + Ned Slider
wrote:
It's also listed in Spamhaus PBL:
http://www.spamhaus.org/pbl/query/PBL043205
I'd say it's pretty much a non-starter trying to reliably deliver
mail
>from that IP.
Sorry - I do not ve
On 02/03/11 08:02, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 02.03.2011 08:56, schrieb Eero Volotinen:
So I can nothing to do with it (in Postfix) config - just to degrade
Postfix with "relayhost" to my ISP SMTP server - what is exactly
what I have did not want.
No need to route all mails to isp, just route n
On 22/02/11 11:47, Matteo Cazzador wrote:
hello i've a strange question about a request, is it possible to create
an account (not alias) that can only receive mail and not send?
I've a virtual server with mysql backend and saslauth that uses imap login.
Thank's
How about a simple check_sender_
On 02/02/11 01:41, Noel Jones wrote:
On 2/1/2011 7:18 PM, Dean Gibson (Mail Administrator) wrote:
Running postfix-2.2.10-1.2.1.el4_7.centos:
When I try to send eMail to a person who uses Yahoo! as their
eMail provider, but to a non-Yahoo domain, I get:
Feb 1 16:34:59 mail postfix/smtp[10551]:
On 01/01/11 21:37, jason hirsh wrote:
I can not find any info where the config file is suppose to be..
Create the file /etc/sysconfig/postgrey
and add desired options like so:
OPTIONS="--delay=30 --auto-whitelist-clients=1"
Hope that helps.
On 03/11/10 21:54, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Ned Slider put forth on 11/3/2010 3:11 PM:
Stan, and others who are using this file - have any of you looked at the
overlap with greylisting? I would imaging that the vast majority of
clients with dynamic/generic rDNS would be spambots and as such I
operation, whereas the rest target PBL type hosts. Other than
that all I've done is clean up a few errors in the original expressions
so the file could run as a PCRE instead of a regexp.
Ned Slider asked the same thing off list recently regarding making this
a project. I think it would be a
On 22/10/10 19:55, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Ned Slider put forth on 10/22/2010 10:50 AM:
On 20/10/10 04:35, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Jeroen Geilman put forth on 10/19/2010 8:09 PM:
You're missing some of the better spam prevention methods here, such as
decent HELO checks, and an RBL or two.
On 20/10/10 04:35, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Jeroen Geilman put forth on 10/19/2010 8:09 PM:
You're missing some of the better spam prevention methods here, such as
decent HELO checks, and an RBL or two.
I'd suggest at least adding reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname in
there, as well as (testin
On 06/10/10 18:16, D G Teed wrote:
Usually I prefer to work within the package management provided
by a distro, or some repository collection. It can provide timely
security updates and you can have some confidence that all
of the updates coming at once are tested to work together.
I avoided th
17 matches
Mail list logo
