On 22.10.2012 16:40, Lima Union wrote:
Hi all! does anyone know where I can find the latest postfix release
(2.9.x) for RHEL 6 x86_64 from some 'trusted' source? unfortunately
Simon Mudd didn't post any package for this platform yet.
Thanks in advance.
LU
Hi,
I have backported Postfix 2.9.x fo
On 04.08.2012 15:50, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
On 4/8/2012 11:11 πμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
I guess something might have been broken in this system.
In /var/log/messages I found large number of errors like:
Aug 3 14:41:13 dc kernel: smtp[13853]: segfault at 1 ip
7f9522e38596 sp 7fff633a5
On 03.08.2012 23:59, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
On 3/8/2012 4:49 μμ, Wietse Venema wrote:
Has the program worked after it was installed? Then find out what
has changed recently. One of those changes broke Postfix.
Searching in logs, I found it was working correctly until Jul 13,
when I upgraded t
On 03.08.2012 15:41, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
Basically, I've installed (and I am using):
[root@dc postfix]# rpm -qa | grep ltb
openldap-ltb-2.4.31-1.el6.x86_64
berkeleydb-ltb-4.6.21.NC-4.el6.patch4.x86_64
openldap-ltb-debuginfo-2.4.31-1.el6.x86_64
There also exist:
db4-4.7.25-17.el6.x86_64
db4-u
On 02.08.2012 09:53, Birta Levente wrote:
You can find the updated Postfix source code at the mirrors listed
at http://www.postfix.org/.
It's not downloadable yet ...
ftp://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-release/index.html
Best regards,
Morten
On 18.01.2012 20:23, Wietse Venema wrote:
Postfix 2.9.0-RC1 is ready for download. Please report any problems
that may remain after a few months of cleaning up. The main changes
in no particular order are:
- Support for long, non-repeating, queue IDs (queue file names).
The benefit of non-repeat
On 25.10.2011 08:19, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Clustering of SMTP servers is accomplished by setting equal MX
priority
in DNS for a given domain's MX hosts. For example:
~$ dig mx ibm.com
...
ibm.com.3600IN MX 10 e1.ny.us.ibm.com.
ibm.com.3600IN
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 08:21:26 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema wrote:
Morten Stevens:
Hi,
Is it possible to define a custom tempfail response for unverified
recipients?
There are no undocumented or invisible unverified_recipient_**
configuration parameters, so your question can be answered 100%
by
Hi,
Is it possible to define a custom tempfail response for unverified
recipients?
For example:
unverified_recipient_reject_reason = User unknown
unverified_recipient_reject_code = 550
rcpt to:
550 5.1.1 : Recipient address rejected: undeliverable
address: User unknown
That's right so fa
