Re: Postfix advice requested

Quoting Viktor Dukhovni : On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 06:12:01PM -0800, david wrote: At 06:07 PM 2/2/2021, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: >On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 06:46:32PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote: > > > > > > > a...@d1.tldd1_a > > > b...@d1.tldd1_b > > > @d1.tld owner_d1 > > > @d2.tld

Re: Emails from localhost [OT]

Upstream RHEL, and therefore CentOS, don't update version numbers when they roll security patches. Latest release though: 2016-10-31 - Jaroslav Škarvada - 2:2.6.6-8 - Backported support for TLS 1.1, TLS 1.2 Not insanely old... Quoting "@lbutlr" : On 03 Jun 2018, at 16:08, Proxy wrote: I'm

Re: new strangeness with O365 [OT]

Quoting Daniele Nicolodi : On 5/17/18 3:59 PM, Mike Guelfi wrote: Quoting Noel Jones : It seems counterproductive to rewrite a plain-text link...  I don't know it there's a setting in the O365 controls to avoid mangling plain text, so you may have to live with it.   -- Noel J

Re: new strangeness with O365

Quoting Noel Jones : On 5/17/2018 9:40 AM, Fazzina, Angelo wrote: Hi, wanted to ask if anyone has this issue and how they deal with it ?   My work email is on O365 and we just turned ATP and EOP on so emails with URLS are being rewritten. That is fine, but my issue is with plain text emails

Re: Lookup tables

postmap is a lookup management tool; doing a query on an IP in a subnet isn't going to succeed. You probably just forgot to enable client_access or reload postfix What does this return? # postconf smtpd_client_restrictions Default is: smtpd_client_restrictions = enabled would be: smtpd_clien

Re: Delays in writing to INBOX

Sounds like GFS2 operating normally. Do you have any metrics on for the performance of the SAN during these events? Quoting Durga Prasad Malyala : Hello all, I am seeing consistent delays in writing to disk (my System redhat 7.2 using GFS2 file system cluster) May 4 10:03:34 mail1 postfix/l

Re: Recording of DANE talk at ICANN61

The m3u contains a link to: http://audio.icann.org/meetings/sju61/sju61-OPEN-2018-03-14-T1732-208bc-zYhNI147Nrs4gtkXUVItrT4uukdYi3nR-en-02.mp3Which does work...On 19 Mar. 2018 19:50, Dominic Raferd wrote:On 17 March 2018 at 19:42, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: [ Also posted t

Re: Postfix is slow accepting incoming mails

postconf -nWould be more useful...

Re: Microsoft silently discarding emails after recepit

Our alternative was always to just set relays for "poorly behaved" domains to go through the ISP email servers. It was slower but more reliable since the ISP had an artificially inflated reputation and more time to complain when it's email was.blocked.

Re: problem with protection.outlook.com released spam getting bounced

Assuming the header check works, I'd run that on a different instance of postfix and route the specific outside servers to that instance via the firewall... Quoting John Stoffel : Well, I've confirmed that EOP (protection.outloko.com, our external Spam filter provider) is adding in the "Del

Re: how to remove string "[MASSMAIL]" from the subject ?

Surely that's going to need to be: /^Subject:(.*)\[MASSMAIL\](.*)/ REPLACE Subject: $1$2 Quoting Ralf Hildebrandt : * Zalezny Niezalezny : As I see here header_checks can do it. There is only one problem. This rule searching for a subject with string [MASSMAIL] and replacing complete subject l

Re: How to setup a no-answer email properly

If people want to use a non RFC compliant verification system, then they're going to have problems with false positives on their spam filter. The operative word being: they. Your customer needs to get their email vendor to whitelist your trac instance. You don't need to do anything -