Re: Email clients timing out. Can you help?

2014-02-11 Thread Michael Weissenbacher
Dear Anthony! You should be ashamed of yourself and the community should be ashamed for allowing you to act this way to new people. Essentially you are insulting someone because he didn't do your homework for you. The link posted by Matthew was a very good starting point for being able doing

Re: Add message-id if it is missing

2012-03-27 Thread Michael Weissenbacher
schrieb Wietse Venema: > Michael Weissenbacher: >> Wietse Venema: >>> Michael Weissenbacher: >>>> I understand that every message should include the message-id Header, >>> >>> RFC 5322 (the current spec for Internet messages) says SHOULD, not >&

Re: Add message-id if it is missing

2012-03-27 Thread Michael Weissenbacher
Wietse Venema: > Michael Weissenbacher: >> I understand that every message should include the message-id Header, > > RFC 5322 (the current spec for Internet messages) says SHOULD, not > MUST. Mail software must therefore not depend on the existence of > this heade

Add message-id if it is missing

2012-03-27 Thread Michael Weissenbacher
Hi List! Simple question: is there an easy way to add a message-id to every incoming message that is missing it? I've digged the documentation and the closest thing i found was the always_add_missing_headers parameters. But i don't want to add any other fields besides a message-id. I understand th

Re: Possibility to store all incoming mail (pre-content_filter)

2011-12-15 Thread Michael Weissenbacher
schrieb Noel Jones: > > > The previously supplied link suggests using the postcat(1) command. > http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#dont_remove > http://www.postfix.org/postcat.1.html > > > > -- Noel Jones > Noel, you have been MOST helpful, thanks again! This substantinates my choice o

Re: Possibility to store all incoming mail (pre-content_filter)

2011-12-15 Thread Michael Weissenbacher
I wrote: > > Just one last question: what is the best way to inspect postfix's queue > files? They look odd in vim :-) > OMG i'm sorry, i just found out about postcat [1] myself, silly me. [1] http://www.postfix.org/postcat.1.html Thanks for your help! cheers, Michael

Re: Possibility to store all incoming mail (pre-content_filter)

2011-12-15 Thread Michael Weissenbacher
schrieb Noel Jones: > > > This sounds like one of the very rare cases where the obscure > http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#dont_remove > option might be helpful. > > something like > # main.cf > dont_remove = 1 > hash_queue_names = deferred, defer, saved > > If you expect to have more tha

Re: Possibility to store all incoming mail (pre-content_filter)

2011-12-15 Thread Michael Weissenbacher
> > You may enable archive quarantine in your pre-queue amavis, > e.g.: > > $archive_quarantine_method = 'local:archive-%m'; > $archive_quarantine_to = 'archive-quarantine'; # default > > to be able to compare a corrupted message to what was seen > by amavisd. This would not help if a pr

Re: Possibility to store all incoming mail (pre-content_filter)

2011-12-15 Thread Michael Weissenbacher
schrieb James Day: > It should be delivered via the local transport, just set "-o content_filter=" > under local in master.cf to override. > Clever. Tried it, but somehow it doesn't work. Mail still passes through all the filters first. Maybe it's because of my odd filter chain: postfix:25 -> ama

Re: Possibility to store all incoming mail (pre-content_filter)

2011-12-15 Thread Michael Weissenbacher
schrieb Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jimenez: > What about tcpdump capture?, then you can reasemble te tcp stream and see > whats going on. > > You can save the capture to a file, then with wireshark you can reasemble the > tcpstream looking to those emails like in postfix. You can capture traffic >

Re: Possibility to store all incoming mail (pre-content_filter)

2011-12-15 Thread Michael Weissenbacher
Original Message Subject: Re: Possibility to store all incoming mail (pre-content_filter) From: Mark Goodge To: postfix-users@postfix.org Date: Thu Dec 15 2011 18:04:06 GMT+0100 (CET) > On 15/12/2011 16:58, Michael Weissenbacher wrote: >> schrieb Mark Goodge: >>

Re: Possibility to store all incoming mail (pre-content_filter)

2011-12-15 Thread Michael Weissenbacher
schrieb Mark Goodge: > On 15/12/2011 16:24, Michael Weissenbacher wrote: >> Hi! >>> >>> You can do this with recpients_bcc_maps >>> >> Well, as far as i know this just adds a "bcc" address to the message and >> as a result the mail wo

Re: Possibility to store all incoming mail

2011-12-15 Thread Michael Weissenbacher
Hi! > > You can do this with recpients_bcc_maps > Well, as far as i know this just adds a "bcc" address to the message and as a result the mail would still pass through amavis and through the smarthost before leaving the system, thus it would get altered (and destroyed if i hit the bug).

Possibility to store all incoming mail

2011-12-15 Thread Michael Weissenbacher
Hi Postfix Gurus! Is there a possibility to store all incoming mail in a central folder at postfix level. I am trying to find a nasty bug in one of our backend systems which corrupts mail data before they arrive in the users's inbox. Therefore i would like to store all imcoming mail unaltered befor

Re: reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname RFC basis?

2011-12-01 Thread Michael Weissenbacher
Hi Blake! Am 2011-12-01 18:09, schrieb Blake Hudson: > I was under the impression that hosts using SMTP were required to have a > valid reverse DNS entry. The reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname > restriction would then enforce this requirement. However, I can't find a > basis for this in RFC 82

Re: postscreen dnsbl services down ß

2011-08-31 Thread Michael Weissenbacher
On Wed Aug 31 2011 12:01:20 GMT+0200 (CET), wrote: > Hello, > > annyone can acknowledge that following dnsbl services are not reachable? > > zen.spamhaus.org*2DOWN > b.barracudacentral.orgDOWN > bl.spamcop.net*2 > combined.rbl.msrbl.net*2 > ix.dnsbl.manitu.net*2DOWN > dnsrbl.

Re: assistance with a CIDR issue

2010-11-18 Thread Michael Weissenbacher
Hi again! > > OK, yes I see my error, however it's still a valid range. > I do mean 94.149.64.0-255 and 94.149.65.0-255 It isn't valid CIDR notation. Maybe this little tool will help you: http://www.subnet-calculator.com/cidr.php - key in your numbers and you'll see that it will correct your range

Re: assistance with a CIDR issue

2010-11-17 Thread Michael Weissenbacher
Hi Jack! > If I am blocking 194.149.65.0/23 this is a standard format, it tells us that > the IP's are the 194.149.65.0-255 and 194.149.66.0-255. This is where you've got it wrong, it means 94.149.64.0-255 and 94.149.65.0-255. If you need 65 and 66 you will need to specify two /24 CIDR entries: 194

Problem with postfix-dnswl-permit (Was Re: REJECT mails to a specific domain -> ERROR mail to postmaster)

2010-09-21 Thread Michael Weissenbacher
Hi Wietse! > Michael Weissenbacher: >> Sep 21 15:04:58 smtp1 postfix/smtpd[14679]: warning: unknown smtpd >> restriction: "med" > > That is also a configuration error. > This error was really HARD to track. Took me the whole day. But now i finally found the rea

Re: REJECT mails to a specific domain -> ERROR mail to postmaster

2010-09-21 Thread Michael Weissenbacher
Hi Wietse! > > Oops. You are getting postmaster noticifications because of the > "Server configuration error". See the maillog file for details. > You need to fix that regardless. > Sorry for the stupid question, but is maillog == /var/log/mail.log ? I think i may have found the problem, i foun

Re: REJECT mails to a specific domain -> ERROR mail to postmaster

2010-09-21 Thread Michael Weissenbacher
Hi Wietse! > > Perhaps some helpful maintainer changed the default setting. > > Please try the following: > > $ postconf -d notify_classes > > The command output should be: > > notify_classes = resource, software > > Apparently, YOUR machine was configured to also notify the postmaste

Re: REJECT mails to a specific domain -> ERROR mail to postmaster

2010-09-21 Thread Michael Weissenbacher
Hi Wietse! Wietse Venema: > > Please look at the output from this command: > > $ postconf -n notify_classes > > This parameter was changed from its default value. Why? > > Wietse > No, i didn't change that parameter before: # postconf -n notify_classes # Now i changed it to: noti

Re: REJECT mails to a specific domain -> ERROR mail to postmaster

2010-09-21 Thread Michael Weissenbacher
ion closed by foreign host. +++ snip2 +++ Original-Nachricht Betreff: REJECT mails to a specific domain -> ERROR mail to postmaster Von: Michael Weissenbacher An: postfix-users@postfix.org Datum: 21.09.2010 13:00 > Hi List! > I have the following problem: one of our

REJECT mails to a specific domain -> ERROR mail to postmaster

2010-09-21 Thread Michael Weissenbacher
Hi List! I have the following problem: one of our customers got a new domain "newdomain.com" where all mail addresses have been transferred to. They also got an old domain "olddomain.com" which had some mail addresses before. It was decided to not use the old domain for receiving emails any more (a

Re: Spam notification

2010-06-18 Thread Michael Weissenbacher
> Conclusion: the spam is passed! I could stop sending notifications but I > > think my employer would not like it... Short answer: You should NEVER notify anyone about detected spam! This will effectively make yourself a spam source. It's even worse when you attach the original message. hth, Mich

Re: Bounces resulting from forwarded Mails

2010-04-08 Thread Michael Weissenbacher
Hi, > Find out why the host rejected the mail. I assume your mails are not > spam and they dont have a virus ( Email virus is almost a non-issue now > a days ) Are all the forwarded mails getting rejected , or only a few Well, i assume that those messages that get rejected (like 1 out of 10) real

Re: Bounces resulting from forwarded Mails

2010-04-07 Thread Michael Weissenbacher
> > Do NOT forward mail to destinations that bounce mail. Either get the > final destination to accept the forward mail or disable the forwarding > when bounces are detected. > Disable bounces is NOT a solution but making the problem worse. > Well, as i already said the destination usually DOES a

Bounces resulting from forwarded Mails

2010-04-07 Thread Michael Weissenbacher
Hi List! I am having the problem that our Postfix Mail Server generates too many bounces which unfortunately results in getting listed (at least at backscatterer.org). Having digged deepter into the problem i already read and followed [1] as well as the obvious stuff like correct local_recipient_ma