Re: filtering messages without using another LDA

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote: > Am 23.03.2010 00:14, schrieb mouss: >>> Also I droped the use of the VDA patches, since it implements >>> everything in Postfix's LDA and I am actually using the Dovecot's >>> (deliver). >> >> well, if you use dovecot, then forget about v

Re: filtering messages without using another LDA

Hi Robert, On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote: [snip] >>> 1. http://postfixquotareject.ramattack.net/ >> >> I took a look at it and, unless I missunderstood, I'll need to add a >> line for each mailbox in the database and that's inviable for my >> setup. >> [snip] > > Hi i d

Re: filtering messages without using another LDA

Hi Reinaldo, On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Mauro Faccenda wrote: >> >> Alternative to that patch? I did some searches and as far as I could >> see, none of the alternatives (that I've found) could reject

Re: filtering messages without using another LDA

Hi mouss, Thank you and Reinaldo very much for your help. I'll take a look at it. ;) Mauro On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 7:14 AM, mouss wrote: > Mauro Faccenda a écrit : >>[snip] >> >> But I don't know yet how to do it with procmail (or similar), and >> that&#

Re: filtering messages without using another LDA

Hi Mouss, Thanks for you answer. Bellow some observations/questions. On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 6:08 PM, mouss wrote: [...] >> This setup doesn't work well for me because it doesn't update the >> maildirsize (I'm using the VDA patches in Postfix) file in the user's >> Maildir and it doesn't automa

Re: alternatative to Mailman

On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 1:35 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote: [...] >> >> My only problem with Mailman is that I can't have two lists with >> the same 'mailbox' (the part before the @) in different virtual >> domains (i.e. supp...@company.com and supp...@anothercompany.com), >> and this is mandatory in my set

Re: alternatative to Mailman

Hm... that makes two recommendations, I'll take a look at it as well. Thanks Victoriano and Martin. Mauro 2010/3/19 Victoriano Giralt : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: RIPEMD160 > > On 19/3/10 16:17, Martin Schütte wrote: >> Mauro Faccenda wrote: >>&g

Re: alternatative to Mailman

Thanks John, With that words said, definitively I'll give it a try. Mauro On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 11:19 AM, John Levine wrote: >>Last time I used majordomo was in the 90's, I don't know if there is a >>web interface. Can you tell me if there is a official one? Or can you >>recommend another sof

filtering messages without using another LDA

Hi again, I'm using a setup integrated with Active Directory with Maildir and I need to do some filtering in messages (basically manipulating some headers). Using procmail as a transport like: --- procmail unix - n n - - pipe flags=Ru user=vmail argv=/usr/bin/pro

Re: alternatative to Mailman

On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > We use Majordomo2 for the postgresql.org lists, and this definitely allows > for supp...@domain1 seperate from supp...@domain2 ... > > > > On Fri, 19 Mar 2010, Mauro Faccenda wrote: > >> Hi there, >> >

alternatative to Mailman

Hi there, I know this isn't exactly a Postfix question, but as postfix's administrators the users of this list probably can answer the question. Does anyone can recommend any good alternative to Mailman as a Mailing Lists Manager that plugs well with Postfix? My only problem with Mailman is that