23 13:26:47 +0100 Antonino Di Mauro via Postfix-users
wrote:
It seems i found the problem.
With Hash file it works fine!
With MySQL DB, I found out Postfix not read encrypt password.
Effectively in my db, password field is encrypted.
although I don't understand why it sends i
It seems i found the problem.
With Hash file it works fine!
With MySQL DB, I found out Postfix not read encrypt password.
Effectively in my db, password field is encrypted.
although I don't understand why it sends it to Gmail...
suggest ?
Thanks
Il 11/03/23 13:46, antonino.dimauro--- vi
i try to remove "smtp_sasl_password_maps" to main.cf but external mail
not send !
In the log file, i can see "fatal error smtp_sasl_password_maps".
I honestly don't know how to fix it...
Il 2023-03-12 13:26 Gerald Galster via Postfix-users ha scritto:
I have checked the commands you listed in
unfortunately I don't know this topic, but I'm really willing to study.
Please do you have any documentation on this?
Messaggio originale
Oggetto: [pfx] Re: MySQL error from not all the receiver
Data: 2023-03-12 13:26
Mittente: Gerald Galster via Postfix-users
Destinatario: Po
I have checked the commands you listed in your first email, but I do not
find any errors in the database, table, or MySQL service. Perhaps, as
you say, this is not the correct path for the configuration.
I just want to send mail directly from the Postfix server without a
relayhost.
What i have
On 9 March 2011 16:19, Reindl Harald wrote:
> [root@mail:~]$ cat maillog | grep -i sasl | grep reindl | tail -n 2
> Mar 9 15:00:22 mail postfix/smtpd[7582]: 0BA7FE9:
> client=rh.thelounge.net[10.0.0.99], sasl_method=PLAIN,
> sasl_username=h.rei...@thelounge.net
> Mar 9 16:23:45 mail postfix/smt
On 9 March 2011 15:46, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> * Mauro :
>> On 9 March 2011 14:04, Noel Jones wrote:
>> > On 3/9/2011 6:57 AM, Mauro wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I my logs I have:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Feb 13 06:27:57 mail1-xen
On 9 March 2011 14:04, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 3/9/2011 6:57 AM, Mauro wrote:
>>
>> I my logs I have:
>>
>>
>> Feb 13 06:27:57 mail1-xen postfix/qmgr[8336]: BF683A28247:
>> from=<..>
>>
>> That number BF683A28247 is a unique nu
On 26 November 2010 12:08, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> snip
>> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
>> check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/maps/internal_networks,
>
> This potentially dangerous restriction might contain permit actions.
> See SMTPD_ACCESS_README.html#danger for the danger. (In case you
> wond
On 29 November 2010 01:56, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 01:36:12PM -0700, ghe wrote:
>
>>> I run postfix and my mail clients use smtps so I was thinking I may as
>>> well close port 25. How can I do that?
>>
>> I'd use iptables or equivalent.
>>
>> I have my doubts about postf
On 28 November 2010 21:58, mouss wrote:
> Le 28/11/2010 21:38, Grant a écrit :
I run postfix and my mail clients use smtps so I was thinking I may as
well close port 25. How can I do that?
>>>
>>> See the description of the "Service type": inet
>>>
>>> http://www.postfix.org/mas
On 25 November 2010 14:11, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 01:54:49PM +0100, Mauro wrote:
>> I have a file: recipient_checks with mym...@example.com REJECT and the
>> corresponding hashed recipient_checks.db.
>> In main.cf I have:
>> s
I have a file: recipient_checks with mym...@example.com REJECT and the
corresponding hashed recipient_checks.db.
In main.cf I have:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
..
..
check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/maps/recipient_checks
The transport is: virtual_transport = dovecot.
When
are you inventing problems?
Well, I don't think I'm inventing problems, maybe I could do it in a
easier way, and that's why I sent this mail to this list. ;)
I had a lot of trouble with my mail servers getting into blacklists
due to backscatter and in this setup I think I'll be more cautious
about it.
Thanks anyway. I think I'll take a look in that PHP code Robert posted
in a previous message.
Mauro
ent and it's working
properly, but I'd like to reject messages in SMTP time, so the sender
can have a comprehensive error message without needing to send him a
bounce messages.
Right now, I can silently drop the message with 'deliver'. It's not
the ideal situation that I'd like to have, but it's already
acceptable.
Thank you for your attention. ;)
Mauro
Hi Reinaldo,
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Reinaldo de Carvalho
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Mauro Faccenda wrote:
>>
>> Alternative to that patch? I did some searches and as far as I could
>> see, none of the alternatives (that I've found) could reject
Hi mouss,
Thank you and Reinaldo very much for your help.
I'll take a look at it. ;)
Mauro
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 7:14 AM, mouss wrote:
> Mauro Faccenda a écrit :
>>[snip]
>>
>> But I don't know yet how to do it with procmail (or similar), and
>> that&#
proach than a patch.
Alternative to that patch? I did some searches and as far as I could
see, none of the alternatives (that I've found) could reject the
message in SMTP. I think it's nice to not generate bouncing
messages/backscatter. But if someone have an alternative besides that,
it's always welcome.
Once more, thanks for your suggestions. ;)
Mauro
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 1:35 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
[...]
>>
>> My only problem with Mailman is that I can't have two lists with
>> the same 'mailbox' (the part before the @) in different virtual
>> domains (i.e. supp...@company.com and supp...@anothercompany.com),
>> and this is mandatory in my set
Hm... that makes two recommendations, I'll take a look at it as well.
Thanks Victoriano and Martin.
Mauro
2010/3/19 Victoriano Giralt :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
> On 19/3/10 16:17, Martin Schütte wrote:
>> Mauro Faccenda wrote:
>>&g
Thanks John,
With that words said, definitively I'll give it a try.
Mauro
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 11:19 AM, John Levine wrote:
>>Last time I used majordomo was in the 90's, I don't know if there is a
>>web interface. Can you tell me if there is a official one? Or
Hi again,
I'm using a setup integrated with Active Directory with Maildir and I
need to do some filtering in messages (basically manipulating some
headers).
Using procmail as a transport like:
---
procmail unix - n n - - pipe
flags=Ru user=vmail argv=/usr/bin/pro
Hi Marc,
Thanks for your suggestion: I'll take a look at it.
Last time I used majordomo was in the 90's, I don't know if there is a
web interface. Can you tell me if there is a official one? Or can you
recommend another software to ease the management?
Again, thanks.
Mauro
anslation is another plus.
On Postfix add-ons page I could see some, but I never heard about them
(besides majordomo and Mailman).
Thanks in advance,
Mauro
> Not really. an OK in smtpd_sender_restrictions does not skip
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions. In particular, it doesn't make you an open
> relay.
If it doesn't skip so why not put directly in
smtpd_recipient_restrictions?
> Almost. You should probably still have at least one domain listed, that
> is used for the right-hand-side of aliases where the target should be a
> local delivery. One approach is to use:
>
> main.cf:
> mydestination = local.invalid
>
> smtpd_sender_restrictions =
>
Il giorno gio, 18/09/2008 alle 14.11 +0200, mouss ha scritto:
> Mauro Sanna wrote:
> > Hello, sorry for my bad english.
> > I have to send messages to more than one person using a single mail
> > address.
> > So I've created a virtual-alias: [EMAIL PROTECTE
Hello, sorry for my bad english.
I have to send messages to more than one person using a single mail
address.
So I've created a virtual-alias: [EMAIL PROTECTED] myaccount and a
text file, myaccount.txt, with all the addresses that I want to send
mail.
Then I put in /etc/aliases:
myaccount: :include
28 matches
Mail list logo
