[pfx] Re: Feature Request: Adjustable Header Log Size Limit in INFO/WARN/REJECT Header_Check

2024-01-25 Thread Matthias Schneider via Postfix-users
Hi Jaroslaw, In this context, it's not about the ability to recognize the message, as unique IDs and postfix long queue IDs can handle that effectively within the 200-character limit. The primary concern is having the capability to log full header values. As Gerald illustrated with the example

[pfx] Re: Feature Request: Adjustable Header Log Size Limit in INFO/WARN/REJECT Header_Check

2024-01-24 Thread Matthias Schneider via Postfix-users
; An: "postfix-users" Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. Januar 2024 23:21:10 Betreff: [pfx] Re: Feature Request: Adjustable Header Log Size Limit in INFO/WARN/REJECT Header_Check > Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users : > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 08:27:53PM +0100, Matthias Schneider via &g

[pfx] Re: Feature Request: Adjustable Header Log Size Limit in INFO/WARN/REJECT Header_Check

2024-01-24 Thread Matthias Schneider via Postfix-users
Request: Adjustable Header Log Size Limit in INFO/WARN/REJECT Header_Check On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 03:10:03PM +0100, Matthias Schneider via Postfix-users wrote: > Initially, I experimented with a Milter for logging the required > headers, but I found that employing a larger %s printf value

[pfx] Re: Feature Request: Adjustable Header Log Size Limit in INFO/WARN/REJECT Header_Check

2024-01-24 Thread Matthias Schneider via Postfix-users
Initially, I experimented with a Milter for logging the required headers, but I found that employing a larger %s printf value proved to be a more efficient solution. However, I'd like to point out that the default configuration for MaxMessageSize in rsyslog is often set to 8k, with the potential

[pfx] Re: Feature Request: Adjustable Header Log Size Limit in INFO/WARN/REJECT Header_Check

2024-01-24 Thread Matthias Schneider via Postfix-users
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. Januar 2024 12:18:54 Betreff: [pfx] Re: Feature Request: Adjustable Header Log Size Limit in INFO/WARN/REJECT Header_Check Dnia 24.01.2024 o godz. 08:20:33 Matthias Schneider via Postfix-users pisze: > > Upon reviewing the code, it appears there are only one li

[pfx] Re: Feature Request: Adjustable Header Log Size Limit in INFO/WARN/REJECT Header_Check

2024-01-23 Thread Matthias Schneider via Postfix-users
Hi Wietse, I understand your perspective on format string limits throughout Postfix. I'd like to clarify that my concern is specific to the 200-byte limit imposed on the logging of header key/values in INFO header_check lines. Upon reviewing the code, it appears there are only one limit on vst

[pfx] Re: Feature Request: Adjustable Header Log Size Limit in INFO/WARN/REJECT Header_Check

2024-01-23 Thread Matthias Schneider via Postfix-users
Venema via Postfix-users" An: "Postfix users" Gesendet: Montag, 22. Januar 2024 16:49:10 Betreff: [pfx] Re: Feature Request: Adjustable Header Log Size Limit in INFO/WARN/REJECT Header_Check Matthias Schneider via Postfix-users: > Thanks for getting back to me quickly. > >

[pfx] Re: Feature Request: Adjustable Header Log Size Limit in INFO/WARN/REJECT Header_Check

2024-01-22 Thread Matthias Schneider via Postfix-users
Thanks for getting back to me quickly. While I understand your concerns about logging reliability, it's important to highlight that, for some users, the log serves as the sole source of truth to confirm whether an email was relayed or rejected in the SMTP process. The challenge we face is the n

[pfx] Re: Enabling TLS1.3 and allow sending over SMTPS/465

2024-01-22 Thread Matthias Schneider via Postfix-users
Hi, i think this has something todo with smtpd_tls_fingerprint_digest: smtpd_tls_fingerprint_digest = ${{$compatibility_level} An: "postfix-users" Gesendet: Montag, 22. Januar 2024 15:44:40 Betreff: [pfx] Enabling TLS1.3 and allow sending over SMTPS/465 Hi, Two questions really, one is

[pfx] Feature Request: Adjustable Header Log Size Limit in INFO/WARN/REJECT Header_Check

2024-01-22 Thread Matthias Schneider via Postfix-users
Dear Postfix Developers, I hope this message finds you well. I'm reaching out to address a concern related to the limit for the header key/value string in the "info", "warn" and "reject" header_check log message during the cleanup process. The current 200-character limit, introduced in 2002 (