mouss schrieb:
> mouss a écrit :
>> Matthias Haegele a écrit :
>>> reject_rhsbl_sender bogusmx.abuseat.org
>> ??? do you mean bogusmx.ref-ignorant.org?
>
> argh. bogusmx.rfc-ignorant.org.
>
> if there's a typo.keyboard-ignorant.org, count
Matthias Haegele schrieb:
> Hi Ihr!
>
> Welche Blacklists kann man denn gerade empfehlen oder welche sollte ich
> lieber nicht auf MTA-Level anwenden?
>
> momentan hab ich folgendes im Einsatz:
Shame on me. Sorry. I took the wrong list.
So i should translate it at lea
Hi Ihr!
Welche Blacklists kann man denn gerade empfehlen oder welche sollte ich
lieber nicht auf MTA-Level anwenden?
momentan hab ich folgendes im Einsatz:
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
reject_rhsbl_sender dsn.rfc-ignorant.org
reject_rhsbl_sender postmaster.rfc-igno
Diego Liziero schrieb:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Henrik K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Terry Carmen wrote:
>>
>>> /[ax]dsl.*\..*\..*/i 450 AUTO_XDSL Email Rejected. You appear to be
>>> connecting from a Dynamic IP address. /client.*\..*\..*/i 450
>>> AUTO_C
The smtp line look correct:
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
If postfix does appear to be listening on external
interfaces, then you have firewall software on that host
interfering with postfix.
Definitely nothing in between, of that I'm certain.
Are there any
J. Bakshi schrieb:
KENNEDY VAN DAM Eric wrote:
Hello Kennedy and Dmitry,
thanks for your kind response.
I have also modified the line as
content_filter = smtpamavis:[127.0.0.1]:10024
Modified it to what?
What shows (command):
/usr/sbin/postconf content_filter
(u missed a "-" in your 1st de
xm niu wrote:
At the moment there are 1300 computers sending their log mails at middlenight everyday.
As a workaround: Why not insert a little randomness and let your
computers send their logs e.g.: between middlenight and 1 am.
[...]
Discover the new Windows Vista
Argh ;-).
--
Greetings
