Hi Wietse,
wie...@porcupine.org:
I have searched every Postfix version that was ever released,
and there is no Postfix version that says "Wrong mailbox syntax".
Please show the actual input and response.
sorry, you are right. I noticed, that the SMTP traffic is filtered
by a security gateway.
Hi List,
I'm having problems receiving mails from a list (assuming LISTSERV).
Messages getting rejected with "553 Wrong mailbox syntax". I think
the error is caused by several asterisks in the MAIL FROM argument.
As I read in RFC 821, asterisks are allowed in , but
even with quotes in the local
Hi Bastian,
* Bastian Blank am 28.07.11,
17:13:
> Please provide more information what you want to do.
sorry, please see my reply <20110729061552.GA3407@bvl-bsn004>
Thanks,
Martin
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
>
Thanks,
Martin
--
Martin Bley
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
,
Martin
--
Martin Bley
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
> This work for 'date' header using IGNORE (or REPLACE changing the
> header name) in header_checks, than cleanup will add a date header.
> If doesn't work the documentation should be fixed or I
> misunderstand?
as Wietse just mentioned to me, that behavior depends on the parameter
undisclosed_re
Dear List,
another questin regarding rewrite rules. I want postfix to rewrite the
To: Header based on envelope to:
1st, I changed the parameter
local_header_rewrite_clients = permit_mynetworks
to do rewriting for all my local clients. In my understanding, the
rewrite will then only be done,
