dress?
>
> On aug. 10, 2017 at 9:06 p.m., mailto:wie...@porcupine.org)> wrote:
>
>
>
> Mai Ling: > FWIW, Mathus, the remote side is simply printing a 5xx one
> line > message "not accepted" banner instead of the expected welcome 220 &g
that is what I am doing right now & waiting for an answer from ISP for
request to allocate a different, «clean» reputation IP address.
>
> On aug. 10, 2017 at 11:45 p.m., mailto:njo...@megan.vbhcs.org)>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On
me destination using the old IP address, a regular
smtp conversation takes place and email is accepted by the remote side!
Thank you
>
> On aug. 10, 2017 at 1:38 p.m., (mailto:uh...@fantomas.sk)> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10.08.17 08:04, Mai Ling wrot
I've already asked them that.
My question is can postfix retry a failed delivery using another
smtp_bind_address than the first tried and failed one?
>
> On aug. 9, 2017 at 5:10 p.m., (mailto:uh...@fantomas.sk)> wrote:
>
>
>
&g
no, it's statically configured
>
> On aug. 9, 2017 at 3:08 p.m., (mailto:domi...@timedicer.co.uk)> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On 9 August 2017 at 12:35, Mai Ling (mailto:mailinglist...@gmail.com)> wrote:
>
>
>
>
My small office client upgraded his internet connection and I've updated the
self hosted postfix configuration file with the new IP address.
Soon after, email users began complaining about bounces they started receiving
for some emails they sent.
After examining logs I've conclude
Every now and then people ask for ways to skip some or all checks defined
in header_checks done by the cleanup daemon, then they learn[1] that due to
postifx design they must figure out workarounds or use external filters.
For example, some want to prevent legitimate users' outgoing mail from
bein